6 Misapprehensions of MAM


Julian Wright TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online

Implementing a media management system is considered to be a risky business. The perceived complexity, upheaval and perception of failure can be so daunting that the risk may seem to outweigh the reward. But, like so many business technologies, MAM have been transformed in recent years and it's time to debunk some common MAM myths.

Perception: MAM implementation projects cost millions

Truth: MAM software is available from as little as £10k

Before its collapse the notorious BBC Digital Media Initiative had racked up a £96m bill. But a pragmatic approach to scope and implementation can deliver real value at low cost. The principal enabler here is the cost of the MAM software.

The cost for a modern product has dropped to around £150k for a base system - with some tools available for as little as £10k. Cloud or hybrid service models make it possible to pay-as-you-go for a fraction of the cost and without long term commitment.

For on-prem' deployed systems the cost reduction is largely as a result of use of open, service based technology as well as vendors designing the foundation tools to be less specific to a given function or workflow. Modern MAMs are architected based on a core with bolt-ons or plug-ins.

Perception : MAM's rarely deliver value on investment

Truth : A targeted approach delivers immediate benefits

Now that MAM system implementations can be achieved for a fraction of the cost, it's easier to prove real value in day-to-day operations and to the bottom-line.

Operators can focus on a specific difficulty in the operation and prove or refine an approach before tackling other areas in the workflow. Defining and building workflows is no longer time consuming so demonstrating operational benefit may be achieved in hours instead of months.

Ensure that the chosen MAM vendor can scale as you broaden deployment though - a modern MAM should readily scale from a few, to a few hundred users without even taking the system off-line.

Perception : Implementation of a MAM system takes months - if not years

Truth : You can be up and running in minutes

MAM history is littered with projects that took years to implement and were obsolete by the time they were delivered. This was generally caused by an over-focus on up-front analysis driven by the need to understand the operating model ahead of configuration, which itself was driven by the complex and time-consuming nature of configuration.

A modern MAM can be up and running in minutes - or seconds in the case of cloud-based system. From the 'vanilla' base an operator can quickly create users, set access permissions and build simple production workflows. A modern MAM allows operators to build and test workflows as they go - an agile approach which delivers rapid results. Because it is now quick and easy to configure and implement a base system, and then customise the system to your needs, there is less pressure to perform a perfect up-front analysis, and more tolerance for changing requirements.

Perception: Deploying a new MAM means replacing the systems we have.

Truth : An effective MAM will integrate with legacy and 3rd party systems.

Subsuming functionality, particularly in active systems is fraught with risk - risk which always translates to cost. The simplest and most cost-effective approach is rarely replacement.

A modern MAM vendor should be able to provide connectors to commonly used 3rd party systems and be willing to build these for legacy components. These connectors are used to get essential data from 3rd party systems, process it and if necessary, put data back. The MAM should be capable of acting as the integration layer that connects systems and, importantly, provide a single view of the operation.

Perception: MAMs only manage media.

Truth : Modern MAMs provide broader capabilities including workflow orchestration and enterprise reporting.

Very few modern MAMs are just asset managers, but perversely the term MAM has stuck because it's one that everyone understands. Rather than just being limited to a static repository where media objects are stored and made accessible, many MAMs include key operational functions such as automatic and task-driven workflows. The automation of tasks such as transcoding in a workflow obviously removes manual process but of equal benefit is a task driven workflow which drives operation procedure - i.e. the people.

Perception: MAM projects require big investments in infrastructure and storage

Truth: Modern MAM's use the cloud for scalability

Although the cost of MAM software is largely flat (or at least should be,) the cost of storage is dependent on the volume of media being produced and stored. When planning on-prem' deployments, system designers - understandably - plan for the worst-case scenario, which means high storage costs and big CAPEX spend.

Using a combination of on-premise and cloud storage allows media operators to avoid spending money up-front for capacity that they may or may not need in the future. MAM vendors like Blue Lucy are able to seamlessly blend the on-prem' and cloud-based services, providing access through a single user experience. This approach offers huge flexibility for 'burst' capacity and de-risks a strategy of cloud migration.


Tags: iss121 | mam | blue lucy | capex | Julian Wright
Contributing Author Julian Wright

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • Metus MAM and Ingest at IBC 2013

    Metus MAM and Ingest at IBC 2013

  • Media Asset Management Software from Blue Lucy at NAB 2017

    Media Asset Management Software from Blue Lucy at NAB 2017

  • Blue Lucy at IBC 2015

    Blue Lucy at IBC 2015

  • Cloud Media Management with Medway from Marquis Broadcast at IBC 2017

    Cloud Media Management with Medway from Marquis Broadcast at IBC 2017

  • Hybrid Cloud Media Aggregation from Cantemo at NAB 2017

    Hybrid Cloud Media Aggregation from Cantemo at NAB 2017

  • Workflow Solutions from Pronology at NAB 2017

    Workflow Solutions from Pronology at NAB 2017

  • Object Based Storage Solutions from Object Matrix at NAB 2017

    Object Based Storage Solutions from Object Matrix at NAB 2017

  • Mediaflex UMS Platform from TMD at NAB 2017

    Mediaflex UMS Platform from TMD at NAB 2017

  • New CEO and news update from TMD at NAB 2017

    New CEO and news update from TMD at NAB 2017

  • Prime Focus Technologies at IBC 2016

    Prime Focus Technologies at IBC 2016

  • ERA - Cloud Services - at BVE 2015

    ERA - Cloud Services - at BVE 2015

  • EditShare at BVE 2015

    EditShare at BVE 2015

  • NETIA at BVE 2015

    NETIA at BVE 2015

  • Dalet at IBC 2014

    Dalet at IBC 2014

  • Tedial at IBC 2014

    Tedial at IBC 2014

  • Pronology at IBC 2014

    Pronology at IBC 2014

  • TMD summarises their work this year at IBC 2014

    TMD summarises their work this year at IBC 2014

  • Metus at IBC 2014

    Metus at IBC 2014

  • Metus at NAB 2014

    Metus at NAB 2014

  • Dalet at NAB 2014

    Dalet at NAB 2014

  • Nexidias Drew Lanham on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Nexidias Drew Lanham on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • EditShare on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    EditShare on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Primestream on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Primestream on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Dalet at IBC 2013

    Dalet at IBC 2013

  • Cinegy: Multiviewer at NAB 2013

    Cinegy: Multiviewer at NAB 2013

  • Dalet at NAB 2013

    Dalet at NAB 2013

  • TMD at NAB 2013: MediaFlex Reporting Module

    TMD at NAB 2013: MediaFlex Reporting Module

  • TMD at NAB 2013: MediaFlex Systems

    TMD at NAB 2013: MediaFlex Systems

  • TMD at NAB 2013: Content Intelligence

    TMD at NAB 2013: Content Intelligence

  • Editshare at NAB 2012

    Editshare at NAB 2012

  • Dalet at NAB 2012

    Dalet at NAB 2012

  • Broadway Systems at NAB 2012

    Broadway Systems at NAB 2012

  • VIZRT at BVE 2012

    VIZRT at BVE 2012

  • PlayBox Technology at BVE North 2011

    PlayBox Technology at BVE North 2011

  • Netia at IBC2011

    Netia at IBC2011

  • Globecast at IBC2011

    Globecast at IBC2011

  • IPV at IBC2011

    IPV at IBC2011

  • Blue Lucy with BLAM3 and their very own cloud at IBC 2018

    Blue Lucy with BLAM3 and their very own cloud at IBC 2018

  • Blue Lucy Media at IBC 2013

    Blue Lucy Media at IBC 2013

  • Blue Lucy at IBC 2012

    Blue Lucy at IBC 2012

  • Blue Lucy Media at BVE 2012

    Blue Lucy Media at BVE 2012


Related Shows
  • How has it been in 2020 for Global Distribution and how does this reflect on the industry

    How has it been in 2020 for Global Distribution and how does this reflect on the industry


Articles
AJA Video Systems - Ki Pro GO User Review with Spellbinder Films
Ben Sherriff The Ki Pro GO is a portable multi-channel H.264 recorder offering up to 4-channels of simultaneous HD and SD recording to off the shelf USB drives with redundant recording capabilities. Our friend Ben Sherriff tales a look
Tags: AJA | ki pro go | dit | h.264 | recorder | live events | usb recording | 10bit | Ben Sherriff
Contributing Author Ben Sherriff Click to read
ERA IaaS at University of Salford
KitPlus The University of Salford (UoS) is widely recognised in both academic and professional circles as a leading educational establishment in acoustics and media production. In 2011 the University moved its television and radio courses from its main campus just outside Salford city centre into the Orange Tower on the main piazza of MediaCityUK (MCUK).

This purpose-built hub for broadcasters, facility houses and production companies was created when redevelopment of the old Salford Quays docks area began in 2007. UoS was among the first institutions to consider moving to MCUK, along with the BBC, which had already committed to transfer many of its departments from London.

Tags: era | salford university | university of salford | seagate | mcuk | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read
In Ear Monitors Help The Cast And Crew of Americas Got Talent Cope With Covid19 Restrictions
KitPlus Capturing performances for television is a stressful business, especially if the programme is being filmed live. You want everything to be perfect but you are also aware that many things can go wrong, even with the best laid plans.
Tags: bubblebee | inear | sidekick | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read
ITN using Densitron Intelligent Display System across multiple news programmes
KitPlus Impressed by the system’s flexibility, ITN has gradually rolled-out the IDS solution for display and control applications across ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 news output
Tags: ids | densitron | itn | newsroom | display | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read
Using Modern Technology at Envy Provides a View into the Future of Post Production
Michael Darer ENVY’s use of modern technology, including remote edit capabilities and their expansive use of Signiant Media Shuttle, enables them to collaborate with customers and partners around the world, and made the transition to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic any easy one. Although project files and media are stored securely on-premises at ENVY’s facilities in London, they are able to collaborate globally thanks to their forward-thinking approach to post production.
Tags: envy | signiant | media shuttle | assetts | Michael Darer
Contributing Author Michael Darer Click to read