A Software Based Approach to Video Monitoring


Anupama Anantharaman - new TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
i

Real-time content monitoring is a mission-critical operation for broadcasters, telecom, and satellite operators. Traditionally, service providers have used monitoring systems based on specialized hardware with a dedicated, fixed interface designed to monitor a specific number of video feeds. Yet, bespoke hardware solutions require a substantial amount of manpower, have a higher cost of ownership than software, and are inflexible. Moreover, a hardware-based monitoring approach duplicates the infrastructure for service providers delivering both traditional broadcast and ABR streaming offerings, resulting in significant inefficiencies.

This article discusses how a software-based approach can be used to consolidate service providers' monitoring operations, increasing operational efficiencies, flexibility, scalability, and cost savings. It will also highlight the challenges that service providers face with regards to monitoring traditional broadcast and ABR streaming services, outlining the key requirements they should look for in a software-based monitoring solution.

Hardware vs. Software Based Monitoring

A software-based, virtualized monitoring probe decouples the monitoring application from any underlining physical hardware, allowing service providers to exploit the increase in processing power and falling costs of IT server hardware. Hardware-based monitoring, on the other hand, runs dedicated applications with fixed bandwidth and network interfaces. If the probe were to break down, service providers would have to spend a significant amount of time and money ordering a replacement, setting up the new system, and dealing with other problems caused due to the downtime.

One of the greatest advantages that service providers can gain with a software-based monitoring approach is dynamic scaling and resource pooling. Service providers no longer need to maintain two, separate monitoring workflows for their traditional broadcast and OTT channels. One software-based monitoring system, with a centralized management interface, can be used for both types of services. Resources are dynamically allocated and capacity is used efficiently. When a monitoring probe is running at its full capacity, it will command maximum resources, but when it's idle, the same resources can be used by other virtual applications.

Using well-defined virtual machine templates, setting up a software-based monitoring probe for broadcast and ABR streaming services is fast and easy. The template takes care of the complete software environment required for running a monitoring probe including the operating system. For an operator, this reduces the installation time and simplifies the installation process.

Scalability increases with software-based monitoring compared with hardware. In particular, service providers can deploy a farm of virtualized monitoring probes and scale their use as and when needed. For example, during normal times an operator may use fewer probes, however, during times of peak viewership and in order to ensure high quality broadcast, the operator can use all the monitoring probes. While this scaling occurs on the fly, dynamic resource pooling ensures that the physical machines are always optimally used either for monitoring or for other tasks.

Software monitoring probes can be managed remotely, and service providers have total control over all monitoring-related functions for their broadcast and ABR streaming services, including real-time and historical monitoring information for video service debugging and analysis. Built-in support for high availability and fault tolerance ensure that the software monitoring probes will run 24x7 with zero downtime.

Transition to Virtualized Software Challenges and Key Requirements

The transition to a software-based virtualized infrastructure can present some challenges. Selecting the right hardware infrastructure to run different applications that are part of a workflow or certifying products from different vendors to work on an IT-approved virtual machine (VM) and operating system can be a time-consuming process.

A real-time monitoring application performs many network I/O operations. In the case of virtual machines, all network traffic must pass through the physical network adapters, the virtual switch, and the virtual network adapters before it reaches the application running on the VM. When processing services with high packet rates, this additional layer of virtual devices can be considered a performance overhead.

Real-time content monitoring solutions are network I/O intensive and latency sensitive; therefore, they need be tuned and configured to take care of overhead. If an existing hardware platform is used for virtualization, the monitoring software must have the right software plugins to communicate with the user interface software. Apart from this, software applications that are intended to run in a virtual environment must be rid of any dependency on custom hardware devices. These are not insurmountable issues, however, all of these factors must be carefully considered for virtualization to work as intended. Furthermore, current custom hardware-based monitoring solutions will have to be completely re-architected, and doing so may be a very difficult proposition.

Conclusion

Given the massive advancements made in computer processing power over recent years, the broadcast industry is shifting from dedicated hardware-based solutions to software-based solutions running on readily available dedicated IT equipment. There is a general consensus among the players in this ecosystem that virtualization is the way to go.

Physical and virtualization servers can be employed to achieve the benefits of flexibility and centralized monitoring. This requires a careful study of monitoring load, costs involved, physical infrastructure, and other factors. Therefore, it's important that operators consider which approach is the best fit for their organization.

Interra Systems' ORION Content monitoring platform helps customers deliver error-free, high quality video. ORION helps service providers consolidate their monitoring operations to gain increased efficiencies while ensuring superior Quality of Service and Quality of Experience across all devices. With a software-based solution like ORION, service providers can perform all critical monitoring functions in a single, integrated platform. Its centralized monitoring and web-based architecture allows remote monitoring through any browser-enabled device, providing extreme flexibility and on-the-go decision-making.


Tags: iss123 | monitoring | virtualization | interra | orion | Anupama Anantharaman - new
Contributing Author Anupama Anantharaman - new

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • KVM over IP with Video Monitoring Wall from Apantac at IBC 2019

    KVM over IP with Video Monitoring Wall from Apantac at IBC 2019

  • Mediaproxy LogServer for compliance monitoring and analysis at NAB 2019

    Mediaproxy LogServer for compliance monitoring and analysis at NAB 2019

  • Glensound 4 x Loudspeaker monitoring subrack at BVE 2019

    Glensound 4 x Loudspeaker monitoring subrack at BVE 2019

  • JVC monitoring solutions DT-G, DT-E, DT-U, and DT-V range at BVE 2018

    JVC monitoring solutions DT-G, DT-E, DT-U, and DT-V range at BVE 2018

  • IP, 3G-SDI + HDR generation, analysis and monitoring from Phabrix NAB 2017

    IP, 3G-SDI + HDR generation, analysis and monitoring from Phabrix NAB 2017

  • Apantac monitoring over IP at NAB 2016

    Apantac monitoring over IP at NAB 2016

  • Wohler MPEG Monitoring Series at IBC 2014

    Wohler MPEG Monitoring Series at IBC 2014

  • Wohler MPEG Monitoring at BVE 2014

    Wohler MPEG Monitoring at BVE 2014

  • Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

    Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

  • The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

    The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

  • Wohler at IBC 2016

    Wohler at IBC 2016

  • Phabrix Qx at IBC 2015

    Phabrix Qx at IBC 2015

  • Phabrix TAG and Rx at IBC 2015

    Phabrix TAG and Rx at IBC 2015

  • NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

    NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

  • Phabrix RX series at IBC 2014

    Phabrix RX series at IBC 2014

  • Volicon Products at IBC 2014

    Volicon Products at IBC 2014

  • Volicon at IBC 2014

    Volicon at IBC 2014

  • Wohler DPP at BVE 2014

    Wohler DPP at BVE 2014

  • Wohler Technologies on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Wohler Technologies on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Volicon on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Volicon on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Calrec Callisto at IBC 2013

    Calrec Callisto at IBC 2013

  • Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

    Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

  • Sound Devices at NAB 2013

    Sound Devices at NAB 2013

  • TSL Products at NAB 2013

    TSL Products at NAB 2013

  • TSL Systems at BVE 2013

    TSL Systems at BVE 2013

  • TSL Products at BVE 2013

    TSL Products at BVE 2013

  • Oxygen DCT at BVE North 2012

    Oxygen DCT at BVE North 2012

  • RTW at NAB 2012

    RTW at NAB 2012

  • TSL at NAB 2012

    TSL at NAB 2012

  • Qualis at NAB 2012

    Qualis at NAB 2012

  • Digital Nirvana at NAB 2012

    Digital Nirvana at NAB 2012

  • Leader at IBC2011

    Leader at IBC2011

  • Murraypro at IBC2011

    Murraypro at IBC2011

  • DK Technology at IBC2011

    DK Technology at IBC2011

  • Interra Systems Broadcast at NAB 2018

    Interra Systems Broadcast at NAB 2018

  • Streaming Media with Interra Systems at NAB 2017

    Streaming Media with Interra Systems at NAB 2017


Related Shows
  • Sony monitoring at BVE with Den Lennie

    Sony monitoring at BVE with Den Lennie


Articles
Working with Remote Workflows
Alex Macleod At the time of me writing this article there is literally no other subject of conversation going on at the moment. The creative industries are on the verge of a complete shutdown, and it’s a seriously scary prospect. The fear & uncertainty is very real.
Tags: iss142 | mediacity training | premier pro | nle | editing | motion templates | Alex Macleod
Contributing Author Alex Macleod Click to read or download PDF
KVM Trends for Broadcast Pros
Jochen Bauer G&D North America Inc., one of the world’s leading KVM manufacturers, presents their latest KVM trends 2020 for broadcast professionals. KVM systems play an essential role in broadcasting by forming the link between IT and broadcast structures and thereby offering operation across systems and independently from any platform.
Tags: iss142 | kvm | ip kvm | kvm over ip | 4k over ip | kvm matrix | remote access | Jochen Bauer
Contributing Author Jochen Bauer Click to read or download PDF
Five Rules for Creating a YouTube Business
KitPlus Ever dream of creating entertaining, impactful videos for a living? YouTube sensation Cherry Wallis and her technical consultant Chris Pearless tell us what they’ve learned throughout her channel’s rise to fame.
Tags: iss142 | cherry wallis | youtube | channel | blackmagic | adsense | google revenue | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read or download PDF
Control, as easy as pressing a button
Bazile Peter

A fundamental issue with control surfaces in modern broadcast operations is that they are, for the most part, old fashioned.

The ease, responsiveness, and functionality of touchscreens, especially in Smartphones are now commonplace. Attributes that are largely absent from touchscreens are typically buttons, sliders, and dials found on many control devices associated with human machine interaction.

Tags: iss142 | densitron | monitor | tactile | Bazile Peter
Contributing Author Bazile Peter Click to read or download PDF
Synced Across Multiple Screens
Christof Haslauer Live TV viewing habits around the world are changing. This is especially true with audiences under 30 who prefer to consume Live TV on their mobile devices rather than on a large screen TV. One of the major reasons for this change is the lack of options for personalisation of content on Linear TV.
Tags: iss142 | ott streaming | rtmp | nativewave | native waves | Christof Haslauer
Contributing Author Christof Haslauer Click to read or download PDF