A bluffers guide to image stabilisation


Mike Colyer TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online

i

(Due to the number of image references this articleis best read via the digital magazine on the link above)

This month’s article is about Jelly. Unfortunately, not the kind that can be served with whipped cream after about four hours in the fridge (sorry) – but instead the video artefact seen from improperly stabilised video cameras.

One of the greatest challenges I face when designing a Special Camera system is how to minimise such vibrations, be they the very passive – such as vibrations from a human wearing a camera system (10 – 20Hz), or more pronounced (try strapping a camera to a race car!).

Many small cameras (including mobile phones) now boast they use Electronic Image Stabilisation (EIS) or Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS) to combat this. In this article, we’ll explore both of the technologies and how picking either one may affect your shoot.

Firstly, Optical Image Stabilisation. OIS uses mechanics in order to perform image stabilisation. This is performed by either shifting the lens, a part of the lens, the sensor – or all of the above. Figure One shows a lens-based OIS implementation. In such an implementation, gyroscopic sensors will feed values measuring lens position in regards to pitch and yaw (as per Figure Two) to a microprocessor. Once the on-board processor has calculated how much displacement has occurred, either magnets or small pouches of fluid are triggered to move the lens in the opposing direction to the movement the camera experienced. In this case, in Figure One, the shifting lens would move up, down, left or right based on this information. This means that the unstable image path entering the lens is compensated for by the motion of the shifting lens, thus meaning the sensor receives a stabilised image.

The alternative approach is to employ EIS, or Electronic Image Stabilising. This method makes no attempt to mechanically stabilise the image, instead relying on in-camera software to interpolate the motion the camera’s gyros have noted, then digitally make corrections based on this.

The first picture shows a camera’s sensor running normally, using the full sensor for active imaging. The second cell shows what happens when EIS is turned on – the image becomes cropped to permit some pixels to be used as ‘buffer’ to provide stabilisation. The final cell shows what happens when the gyros detected that the camera’s lens has pitched up – it has compensated by using a lower section of the sensor for the active image, now turning the upper area of the sensor into unused, buffer pixels.

There is no ‘better’ technology – however, I tend to consider a few things before selecting which approach I wish to use.

Firstly, OIS has the disadvantage that systems tend to be slightly larger with a higher cost. If it is expected the camera could be damaged or needs to be kept small, it can sometimes be hard to justify the additional bulk or price for a camera that may only ever be used once! In addition to this, having additional moving elements does, in some cases, reduce how robust the system is.

However, EIS in many cases reduces the overall resolution of the image to provide the needed buffer space for the image stabilisation. Also, as no attempt to stabilise the image has been made, motion blur can sometimes be more pronounced as the image being captured by the sensor is less stable.

For now, it remains a balancing act when it comes to selecting how best to stabilise a camera. Of course, no solution is better than a properly mounted rig – yet I’ll be looking around IBC this year with keen eyes to see how manufacturers have developed on their stabilisation techniques.


Tags: iss127 | stabilisation | eis | ois | Mike Colyer
Contributing Author Mike Colyer

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • BeyondHD - Letus Helix Gimbal System at BVE 2015

    BeyondHD - Letus Helix Gimbal System at BVE 2015

  • Memory Mic from Sennheiser shown at IBC 2018

    Memory Mic from Sennheiser shown at IBC 2018

  • Sennheiser iPhone Microphones at IBC 2107

    Sennheiser iPhone Microphones at IBC 2107

  • Sennheiser HandMic digital and MKE 440 at IBC 2016

    Sennheiser HandMic digital and MKE 440 at IBC 2016

  • Sennheiser VR at IBC 2016

    Sennheiser VR at IBC 2016

  • Zeiss at BVE 2016

    Zeiss at BVE 2016

  • Sennheiser HDM Pro at BVE 2014

    Sennheiser HDM Pro at BVE 2014

  • Carl Zeiss on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Carl Zeiss on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Sennheiser at BVE 2012

    Sennheiser at BVE 2012

  • Sennheiser at BVE North 2011

    Sennheiser at BVE North 2011

  • The KitPlus NAB kit overview video

    The KitPlus NAB kit overview video

  • KitPlus filming rig used at NAB 2017

    KitPlus filming rig used at NAB 2017

  • KitPlus filming rig used at BVE 2017

    KitPlus filming rig used at BVE 2017

  • Kit Overview from IBC 2015

    Kit Overview from IBC 2015

  • Blackmagic Design at NAB 2012

    Blackmagic Design at NAB 2012

  • Pinknoise at BVE North 2012

    Pinknoise at BVE North 2012

  • Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2014

    Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2014

  • Digital Vision on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Digital Vision on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013


Related Shows
  • KitPlusTV summarise the Broadcast and Pro Video News 14th December 2020

    KitPlusTV summarise the Broadcast and Pro Video News 14th December 2020


Articles
Streaming Technologies Explained
Bruce Devlin - new

The word streaming can relate to different technologies from different manufacturers in different scenarios and in this short article we are going to take a little tour of what it all means. 

Tags: mr mxf | streaming | hls | dash | cmaf | mpeg | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new Click to read
REVIEW - Hollyland MARS 400S PRO Digital Wireless Transmission System
Phil Vinter

Built by Hollyland and costing around £600 the Mars 400S is an easy-to-use wireless video transmitter/receiver system – it will be right up the alley of anyone who, like me, considers an instruction manual to be nothing more than box padding.

Read Phils Full review here, and link to the video review.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | MARS 400 | wireless | tx | rx | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read
HOLLYLAND LARK 150 Review
Phil Vinter

The exponential growth of video supercharged a technological revolution that began in the early noughties with the advent of DSLR cameras.
The cinematic-style shallow depth of field image video quality from DSLRs was a revelation, but, back then audio was the big drawback. As demand has grown so the technology has improved and today’s one-man-band small rig set ups can capture pretty good sound into a DSLR style camera.

Phil Vinter reviews the latest release from HOLLYLAND and it's a thumbs up from us.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | radio mic | audio | LARK-150 | CVP | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read
How to successfully buy AV and Broadcast Equipment at Auction
Dan Main

Perhaps you wouldn't expect an auctioneer to tell you this - but yes, there are risks to buying equipment at auction; just probably not the risks that you think.

So what are the real risks to buying at auction, and how can they be managed?

To watch the interview with Dan please click here

Tags: auction | tips | buying at an auction | fraud | auction risks | Dan Main
Contributing Author Dan Main Click to read
AJA Video Systems - Ki Pro GO User Review with Spellbinder Films
Ben Sherriff The Ki Pro GO is a portable multi-channel H.264 recorder offering up to 4-channels of simultaneous HD and SD recording to off the shelf USB drives with redundant recording capabilities. Our friend Ben Sherriff tales a look
Tags: AJA | ki pro go | dit | h.264 | recorder | live events | usb recording | 10bit | Ben Sherriff
Contributing Author Ben Sherriff Click to read