An Obituary to Timecode


Bruce Devlin - new TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online

A stoic and persistent character that stubbornly refused to change with the times, Timecode has finally passed on, but no-one has noticed. A long-lasting industry veteran, Timecode was brought into this world at an uncertain date in the late 1960s due to the needs of analogue tape workflows and the demand for synchronisation between audio and video devices. A joint activity between SMPTE and the EBU led to the work on Time and Control codes starting its journey to standardisation in the early 1970s.

Timecode rapidly became popular and had its own TV performance on 19 May 1975 when it was recognised with an Academy Citation at the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences Emmy Awards ceremony in Hollywood. This fundamental standard remained the bedrock of TV operations for over 4 decades.

You can always spot an American broadcast engineer’s children at nursery school because they learn to count in drop frame timecode from an early age. The remaining 75% of the planet that uses integer frame rates finds this either quaint or unusual.

Strange counting modes aside, it was becoming apparent that timecode was too course a measure to work in the digital age. It could not synchronise individual digital audio samples nor groups of audio samples unless they were an integer multiple of a frame rate. Neither could timecode synchronise many metadata elements that had no relationship to a video clock. Poor working practises were also making problems for timecode. Many proprietary caption and subtitle formats from the 1970s and 1980s never identified the underlying frame rate of the captions and therefore the time codes found within the file were often difficult to line up with the video because an original video at 24fps might be captioned at 25fps, 29.97fps or 30fps. It is often impossible to know the frame rate by inspecting the time codes found in the caption file.

With the introduction of file based working, synchronisation that was accurate to the audio sample was now essential and therefore a new timing regime was introduced. Some systems used floating point numbers, but many resorted to defining durations in terms of a rational number called edit units based on the sampling rate of the underlying audio or video. For this reason, you find many MXF files with an edit rate of (30000 / 1001) where each edit unit is (1001 / 30000) seconds.

This method is always exact and works for new frame rates like 90fps used for Virtual Reality, 120 fps or (120000 / 1001) fps used for High Frame Rate Video and any rate that has an exact representation. It also allows hardware designers to use integer counters which makes life (and chip real estate) easier.

With the introduction of IP networks and IMF compositions we are becoming even more precise in the definition of timing and synchronisation and timecode is no longer the required timing and synchronisation mechanism. The IMF User Group (https://imfug.com) is about to publish its first Best Practise document that can be summarised as “Don’t use Timecode”. This means that everyone with a MAM full of timecode in / out / duration values needs to do a little thought before blindly applying them to an automated IMF workflow. It’s not hard, but you have to do a bit of thinking.

Timecode had a long, healthy and productive life. It’s time for it to rest in peace and move on. Good-bye timecode. Like the drop frame count of 00:02:00;01 you will be missed.

Ciao
Bruce


Tags: iss134 | timecode | smpte | ebu | edit | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • SMPTE 2110, UHD and HDR solutions from Phabrix at NAB 2019

    SMPTE 2110, UHD and HDR solutions from Phabrix at NAB 2019

  • PHABRIX QXIP support for SMPTE 2110

    PHABRIX QXIP support for SMPTE 2110

  • SMPTE on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    SMPTE on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • IP, 3G-SDI + HDR generation, analysis and monitoring from Phabrix NAB 2017

    IP, 3G-SDI + HDR generation, analysis and monitoring from Phabrix NAB 2017

  • Argosy at IBC2011

    Argosy at IBC2011

  • NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

    NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

  • Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

    Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

  • TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

    TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

  • JVC at BVE 2013

    JVC at BVE 2013

  • Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

    Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

  • Junger Audio at IBC2011

    Junger Audio at IBC2011

  • Sonnet Technologies demo a mobile workstation for editing in the field at IBC 2018

    Sonnet Technologies demo a mobile workstation for editing in the field at IBC 2018

  • Wor4X and EditBridge from Marquis at NAB 2017

    Wor4X and EditBridge from Marquis at NAB 2017

  • Glensound Expedition at IBC 2015

    Glensound Expedition at IBC 2015

  • FORSCENE Cloud Editing at NAB 2015

    FORSCENE Cloud Editing at NAB 2015

  • EditShare at BVE 2015

    EditShare at BVE 2015

  • Editors Keys at NAB 2014

    Editors Keys at NAB 2014

  • EditShare on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    EditShare on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Scott Hill uses EditShare: Lightworks at NAB 2013

    Scott Hill uses EditShare: Lightworks at NAB 2013

  • Editors Keys at BVE North 2012

    Editors Keys at BVE North 2012

  • Editshare at NAB 2012

    Editshare at NAB 2012

  • Editec at BVE 2012

    Editec at BVE 2012

  • Editors Keys at ProVideo2011

    Editors Keys at ProVideo2011

  • Davinci Resolve 14 with Fairlight from Blackmagic Design at NAB 2017

    Davinci Resolve 14 with Fairlight from Blackmagic Design at NAB 2017

  • Marquis Broadcast at NAB 2016

    Marquis Broadcast at NAB 2016

  • Grass Valley at BVE 2015

    Grass Valley at BVE 2015

  • Forscene at IBC 2014

    Forscene at IBC 2014

  • Quantel LiveTouch at IBC 2014

    Quantel LiveTouch at IBC 2014

  • Quantel deal with AFP at IBC 2014

    Quantel deal with AFP at IBC 2014

  • Snell Kahuna Production Switcher at IBC 2014

    Snell Kahuna Production Switcher at IBC 2014

  • Forbidden Technologies FORscene at BVE 2014

    Forbidden Technologies FORscene at BVE 2014

  • Forbidden Technologies FORscene App at BVE 2014

    Forbidden Technologies FORscene App at BVE 2014

  • Forbidden Technologies on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Forbidden Technologies on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Lightworks on BroadcastShow Tour May 2013

    Lightworks on BroadcastShow Tour May 2013

  • Dalet at NAB 2013

    Dalet at NAB 2013

  • AJA at BVE 2013

    AJA at BVE 2013

  • Autodesk at NAB 2012

    Autodesk at NAB 2012

  • Root6 at BVE 2012

    Root6 at BVE 2012

  • ERA at BVE 2012

    ERA at BVE 2012

  • Avid at BVE North 2011

    Avid at BVE North 2011


Related Shows
  • KitPlus TV with Arrow X1 tripod, updates to your editing hardware and streaming tips from Alister Chapman

    KitPlus TV with Arrow X1 tripod, updates to your editing hardware and streaming tips from Alister Chapman


Articles
Connect A Broadcast-Quality Miniature Camera To Your Computer!
Spencer Doran Upgrade any home working or live streaming setup with a broadcast-quality professional webcam
Tags: webcam | marshall | CV503 | USB | ZOOM | Streaming | Spencer Doran
Contributing Author Spencer Doran Click to read
Virtualising your Playout
Alison Pavitt

The buzz around virtualised playout is exponentially growing with increased deployments. But questions remain about the economic, logistical and technical benefits to the end user.

Conversation has shifted and amplified, with the debate around the private/public cloud escalating and new cloud-native solutions entering the market. So, what do you need to consider today if you are thinking about virtualising?

Tags: iss142 | playout | pebble beach | cloud | Alison Pavitt
Contributing Author Alison Pavitt Click to read or download PDF
KVM Trends for Broadcast Pros
Jochen Bauer G&D North America Inc., one of the world’s leading KVM manufacturers, presents their latest KVM trends 2020 for broadcast professionals. KVM systems play an essential role in broadcasting by forming the link between IT and broadcast structures and thereby offering operation across systems and independently from any platform.
Tags: iss142 | kvm | ip kvm | kvm over ip | 4k over ip | kvm matrix | remote access | Jochen Bauer
Contributing Author Jochen Bauer Click to read or download PDF
CLASS Is Remote Cloud Working the New Norm
Bruce Devlin - new The Tuk-tuk driver has just dropped us off at the hotel in Jaipur. The guard has let us through the gates, past the dogs and the obligatory cow rummaging in the garbage. We wash our hands, head for the bar and before the first Kingfisher beer arrives, I am connected to the virtual Mr MXF compute kingdom where a million unread emails, Slack messages, requests for help with broken workflows and rejected files are waiting on a collection of virtual servers somewhere in cloud-land.
Tags: iss142 | mrmxf | mr mxf | covid-19 | remote | gotomeeting | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new Click to read or download PDF
Control, as easy as pressing a button
Bazile Peter

A fundamental issue with control surfaces in modern broadcast operations is that they are, for the most part, old fashioned.

The ease, responsiveness, and functionality of touchscreens, especially in Smartphones are now commonplace. Attributes that are largely absent from touchscreens are typically buttons, sliders, and dials found on many control devices associated with human machine interaction.

Tags: iss142 | densitron | monitor | tactile | Bazile Peter
Contributing Author Bazile Peter Click to read or download PDF