AoIP in the intercom world


John Sparrow TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online

Everyones talking about using AoIP (Audio over IP) in the broadcast world, but what does it mean to the operators actually making the production - the intercom users? And after years of interoperability taking the lowest common format of analogue tie-lines (also known as 4-wires), has intercom today already moved into the digital world by sharing digital audio resources with other types of hardware?

Until recently there were several standards for transporting digital audio between hardware; some of them common to the manufacturers, some standard amongst a number of different manufacturers and some just totally bespoke. Todays standardisation on Dante and AES67 helps simplify matters, but how?

Interoperability has always been part of the intercom world; analogue 2-wire beltpacks allowed different areas to work together over microphone cables or tie-lines, as an early example. Then the intercom world explored the benefits of telephony to interconnect operators across sites and even countries using POTS (analogue telephony). This was basically extending 4-wires across telephone copper cables - it was expensive and had balance issues resulting in feedback of your own voice, but it worked sufficiently well. Add simple GPIOs (general purpose interfaces, contact closures etc.) and you had some basic signalling between intercom systems. Digital Intercom had to use multiple lines to carry both voice routing and signalling data - anyone remember voice over data modems?

When ISDN came along the digital interconnection started to become much easier to manage, and ISDN interfaces for everything audio became the fashionable item to have. It was still costly, and the ISDN lines often had to be booked in advance, but it worked in a similar way to POTS, just with embedded data and caller ID.

Within the studio complex MADI grew to be the digital audio interface of choice, allowing multiple streams of AES3 audio from, for example, a sound desk mix-minus bus to the intercom system over a single cable, rather than 64 pairs of analogue 4-wires. MADI (AES10) worked well between devices and was effectively the forerunner of todays AoIP communications.

Early adopters in IP connectivity from a manufacturing point of view include Trilogy Communications, which launched the worlds first IP connected intercom in 2002. The system used standards-based IP networks to allow intercommunication between intercom matrices, which permitted Trilogy to install several hundred systems world-wide that were all interconnected. At this early stage intercom bandwidth was controlled by the use of compression codecs; in this case G.722 was the best one that could be used, with an audio bandwidth of around 7.5kHz, which has since been proven to be adequate for talkback needs.

Advances in technology saw the introduction of IP connectivity of the intercom panel, again using standards-based IP networks. This meant that panels could be sited anywhere within the Wide Area Network and put more and more onus on the IT engineers rather than broadcast engineers, which was an issue in itself. Most IP panel connections shunned compression of the audio to achieve lower latency, since its no good telling a cameraman to switch shots and having the intercom arrive some seconds too late! IP panels were also fighting for bandwidth with other uses of the IP network, be it an office network or something also serving video, so we were introduced to the world of VPNs.

Various interoperability Audio over IP standards started to appear, and the joys of a plug-fest where different manufacturers joined their hardware together to test interoperability became fashionable. The EBU worked first on video interoperability then proceeded to work on audio interoperability between intercom manufacturers. Differing standards included Ravenna, AVB and Dante, all fighting to be the technology to use as a joiner between disparate audio systems. It was obvious that a single standard was needed and various groups were working together to achieve something that we knew would just be plug and play.

The common technology below all these standards is AES67 with more sophistication built above it, like discovery and routing within the higher standards like Audinates Dante¢. This base level makes AES67 the AoIP choice, certainly between devices within a contained system such as between end-points within a single manufacturers system, where discovery and clocking is provided by the system.

Dantes rapid acceptance within the live event and performance communities meant that this was the choice for Clear-Com when providing simple connectivity to music consoles, public address and other intercom systems.

The advantages of using IP to interconnect different audio devices include being able to leverage existing IT equipment with their diagnostics capabilities, and also use the legions of trained IT engineers - although this has brought its own problems in terms of training them to respect the differences between audio and video media. It is perhaps more important that the audio (or video) contained within an IP packet arrives quickly and without delay than the message sent to a printer in an office!

So, things like QoS (quality of service) and the network resilience with multiple alternate routes have become important, and the industry has created such things as spine and leaf network layouts to provide for redundant connections with a layer of control software to ensure it all works.

AES67, with further refinements on technical options, clocking and discovery, is the common standard for audio and intercom over IP, especially within broadcast operations. For our customers, the ability to link multiple manufacturers boxes together and share multi-channel programme audio with ease, and to monitor its routing and diagnostics using easily available IT tools, is releasing broadcasters from the complexities of standards conversion and hardware patching and monitoring. For these reasons, the march toward the adoption of AES67 is well under way and I would expect to see many examples of this claim this year.

AES67 (via Dante) also allows large intercom systems to be connected offering scalable, future-proof solutions for the production staff to utilise to their advantage. Intercom has always had to play its part in being interoperable with audio systems and a common standard like AES67 is only going to help everyone communicate better, more quickly and at a higher quality than ever before.


Tags: iss128 | clearcom | clear-com | dante | aes67 | beltpack | isdn | John Sparrow
Contributing Author John Sparrow

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • 32 Keypanel Intercoms from Clearcom at NAB 2017

    32 Keypanel Intercoms from Clearcom at NAB 2017

  • CLEARCOM LQ SYSTEM at NAB 2015

    CLEARCOM LQ SYSTEM at NAB 2015

  • CLEARCOM FREESPEAK at NAB 2015

    CLEARCOM FREESPEAK at NAB 2015

  • CLEARCOM IOS INTERCOM at NAB 2015

    CLEARCOM IOS INTERCOM at NAB 2015

  • Clearcom at IBC 2012

    Clearcom at IBC 2012

  • JVC at BVE North 2011

    JVC at BVE North 2011

  • Intercom over AES67 with V-Series IRIS from Clear-Com at IBC 2018

    Intercom over AES67 with V-Series IRIS from Clear-Com at IBC 2018

  • Clear-Com adds Freespeak Edge 5Ghz 8ch and configurable at IBC 2019

    Clear-Com adds Freespeak Edge 5Ghz 8ch and configurable at IBC 2019

  • Clear-Com Free Speak II IP Transceiver at IBC 2018

    Clear-Com Free Speak II IP Transceiver at IBC 2018

  • Clear-Com E-IPA Card for Eclipse HX Digital Matrix at NAB 2018

    Clear-Com E-IPA Card for Eclipse HX Digital Matrix at NAB 2018

  • Virtual Panel on Apple watch from Clear-Com at NAB 2018

    Virtual Panel on Apple watch from Clear-Com at NAB 2018

  • Mobile comms from Clear-Com with LQV4 software and Agent-IC shown at BVE 2018

    Mobile comms from Clear-Com with LQV4 software and Agent-IC shown at BVE 2018

  • Clear-Com HelixNet at NAB 2016

    Clear-Com HelixNet at NAB 2016

  • Clear-Com FreeSpeak II at NAB 2016

    Clear-Com FreeSpeak II at NAB 2016

  • Clear-Com at IBC 2015

    Clear-Com at IBC 2015

  • Clear-Com LinQ at IBC 2014

    Clear-Com LinQ at IBC 2014

  • Clear-Com FreeSpeak II at IBC 2014

    Clear-Com FreeSpeak II at IBC 2014

  • Clear-Com ProGrid at NAB 2014

    Clear-Com ProGrid at NAB 2014

  • Clear-Com HelixNet Partyline at NAB 2014

    Clear-Com HelixNet Partyline at NAB 2014

  • Clear-Com: Concert at NAB 2013

    Clear-Com: Concert at NAB 2013

  • Clear-Com Eclipse HX at NAB 2013

    Clear-Com Eclipse HX at NAB 2013

  • Clear-Com: HelixNet Partyline at NAB 2013

    Clear-Com: HelixNet Partyline at NAB 2013

  • Clear-Com: Tempest at NAB 2013

    Clear-Com: Tempest at NAB 2013

  • Clear-Com Tempest at NAB 2012

    Clear-Com Tempest at NAB 2012

  • Clear-Com Eclipse MADI Card at NAB 2012

    Clear-Com Eclipse MADI Card at NAB 2012

  • Clear-Com Eclipse at NAB 2012

    Clear-Com Eclipse at NAB 2012

  • Clear-Com HelixNet Partyline at NAB 2012

    Clear-Com HelixNet Partyline at NAB 2012

  • Clear-Com at IBC2011

    Clear-Com at IBC2011

  • AES3 to Dante / AES67 converters from Glensound at NAB 2019

    AES3 to Dante / AES67 converters from Glensound at NAB 2019

  • Glensound Beatrice Dante Intercom at ISE 2019

    Glensound Beatrice Dante Intercom at ISE 2019

  • Glensound Anthens 2 Dante Turntable Pre-Amplifier at ISE 2019

    Glensound Anthens 2 Dante Turntable Pre-Amplifier at ISE 2019

  • SSL Dante AoIP with System T from Solid State Logic at IBC2019

    SSL Dante AoIP with System T from Solid State Logic at IBC2019

  • Glensound Dante Intercom System at IBC 2017

    Glensound Dante Intercom System at IBC 2017

  • Glensound Dante at IBC 2014

    Glensound Dante at IBC 2014

  • Glensound Comedia at ISE 2020

    Glensound Comedia at ISE 2020

  • Virgil OB headphone amplifier from Glensound at NAB 2018

    Virgil OB headphone amplifier from Glensound at NAB 2018

  • Live Sports Broadcast Commentator from Glensound at NAB 2017

    Live Sports Broadcast Commentator from Glensound at NAB 2017

  • Glensound at IBC 2016

    Glensound at IBC 2016

  • Glensound at NAB 2016

    Glensound at NAB 2016

  • Glensound show Beatrice the AES67 Network audio intercom beltpack at IBC 2018

    Glensound show Beatrice the AES67 Network audio intercom beltpack at IBC 2018

  • PARADISO Lite commentary unit from Glensound at BVE 2018

    PARADISO Lite commentary unit from Glensound at BVE 2018

  • RTS at BVE 2017

    RTS at BVE 2017

  • RTS Telex at IBC2011

    RTS Telex at IBC2011


Related Shows
  • Working remotely with AoIP Dante® network audio

    Working remotely with AoIP Dante® network audio


Articles
Sennheiser MKE 400 hands on review and test
KitPlus

Sennheiser have just released two products aimed at simplifying audio on the move, the MKE400 shotgun microphone and the XS Lav Mic, in this review we’re looking at the MKE400.

Tags: sennheiser mke400 | sennheiser mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 quality | best microphones for youtube | mic for youtube videos | sennheiser mke 400 hands on | microphone review | iphone videography | microphones | sound for video | camera microphone | microphone for iphone | microphone for youtube | video microphone | shotgun mics | smartphone microphone | vlogging mic | best microphone for video | shotgun microphone review | mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 hands on review | sennheiser mke 400 test | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read
A Broadcasters Guide to Microservices
Roger Persson

The word “microservices” has been creeping into the conversation about software-centric systems recently. Is it really a different approach, what does it mean, and what are the advantages?

Tags: nxt edition | microservices | modular software | Roger Persson
Contributing Author Roger Persson Click to read
Streaming Technologies Explained
Bruce Devlin - new

The word streaming can relate to different technologies from different manufacturers in different scenarios and in this short article we are going to take a little tour of what it all means. 

Tags: mr mxf | streaming | hls | dash | cmaf | mpeg | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new Click to read
REVIEW - Hollyland MARS 400S PRO Digital Wireless Transmission System
Phil Vinter

Built by Hollyland and costing around £600 the Mars 400S is an easy-to-use wireless video transmitter/receiver system – it will be right up the alley of anyone who, like me, considers an instruction manual to be nothing more than box padding.

Read Phils Full review here, and link to the video review.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | MARS 400 | wireless | tx | rx | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read
HOLLYLAND LARK 150 Review
Phil Vinter

The exponential growth of video supercharged a technological revolution that began in the early noughties with the advent of DSLR cameras.
The cinematic-style shallow depth of field image video quality from DSLRs was a revelation, but, back then audio was the big drawback. As demand has grown so the technology has improved and today’s one-man-band small rig set ups can capture pretty good sound into a DSLR style camera.

Phil Vinter reviews the latest release from HOLLYLAND and it's a thumbs up from us.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | radio mic | audio | LARK-150 | CVP | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read