Audio monitoring: critical to visual media services


Simen Frostad TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
by Simen Frostad
Issue 89 - May 2014

Its a fact of TV broadcasting that audiences will tolerate reduced visual quality much more readily than any impairment to the audio. So long as the audio continues and is intelligible, viewers tend to put up with glitches in the video or even temporary loss of picture. But if a broadcaster lets the audio quality drop or loses audio altogether, thats when the viewer gives up and switches channel.

So audio quality is critical to TV and video media services. And if audio monitoring seems to lurk in the shadows in the context of digital media services, while the monitoring of video occupies the spotlight, it is perhaps because audio is such a vital part of the service that it is unquestioned.

The nature of human perception also has something to do with this. An operator can sit at a monitoring console and comfortably eyeball 50 services or more concurrently, with a well-designed display. But its quite impossible for anyone to monitor more than one audio source at the same time. So the audio monitoring has to be done robotically in the background, and only when error conditions arise does a visual alert make its presence felt.

In a system like the Bridge Technologies VB288, the immediate impression is of video monitoring activity because the content extraction processes continually display each channels video stream. The audio monitoring is happening too, but without a visual presence on the display until a service degradation or failure occurs.

In fact theres an lot of audio monitoring going on under the hood. This is because audio monitoring has become extremely demanding, with loudness compliance required by law, and with widespread use of surround sound audio. Monitoring systems like the VB288 have to continuously decode the audio to check for loudness compliance, and for the presence of all the components of a surround sound source. For the service provider, its a serious failure even if just one of those 5.1 or 7.1 components disappears.

Add to this the load involved in multiple-language services, where there might be five language sources for a channel, each with 5.1 sound (making 30 channels to check), and the audio monitoring requirement for a visual media service becomes very demanding.

As always when a lot of services need monitoring, the design of the monitoring technology is critical to efficient operation. If the monitoring information is presented clearly in a way that allows a small number of operators to keep on top of a large number of services, this benefits the service provider not only in terms of cost but in higher service quality too: when operators instantly get the information they need, repair times are dramatically shortened.

One big difference between audio and video delivery may be about to disappear. Unlike the video component of a service, the audio component has hitherto been delivered at one quality level only. While H264 adaptive streaming to mobile devices downshifts the video quality when receiving conditions mean that the bandwidth is inadequate to view the better quality without buffering, the audio continues to be streamed without this adaptation.

H265/HEVC may change this over the next twelve months or so. The video part of the specification is pretty settled, but there are still different directions on the audio. So while H265 compliant monitoring systems will have to support all the codecs in the same box (MPEG-1, MPEG-2, AAC, HE-AAC and beyond), there may also be provision for multi-versioning adaptive audio in the specification.

Whatever the outcome of this process over the next years, theres the prospect of greater diversity in audio delivery, and therefore in audio monitoring. Digital media service providers will need to keep abreast of these developments, and build monitoring systems that handle the audio monitoring requirement elegantly and efficiently, as part of the overall monitoring environment.


Tags: iss089 | bridge technologies | audio monitoring | Simen Frostad
Contributing Author Simen Frostad

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

    Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

  • Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

    Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

  • Bridge Technologies at IBC 2012

    Bridge Technologies at IBC 2012

  • Bridge Technologies at IBC2011

    Bridge Technologies at IBC2011

  • The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

    The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

  • Wohler at IBC 2016

    Wohler at IBC 2016

  • TSL Products at NAB 2013

    TSL Products at NAB 2013

  • TSL Systems at BVE 2013

    TSL Systems at BVE 2013

  • TSL Products at BVE 2013

    TSL Products at BVE 2013

  • TSL at NAB 2012

    TSL at NAB 2012

  • Murraypro at IBC2011

    Murraypro at IBC2011

  • DK Technology at IBC2011

    DK Technology at IBC2011


Articles
A switch in time: how KVM can unlock the future of broadcasting
Chris Smeeton

One of the major changes for broadcasters during the pandemic has been the shift towards remote production; by no means a new phenomenon in an IP environment, yet accelerated under lockdown to accommodate travel and gathering restrictions. A 2021 report found that almost 40% of broadcast professionals now employ remote production, up 9% on the previous year.

Tags: KVM | ARGOSY | GDSYS | KVM Tech | Chris Smeeton
Contributing Author Chris Smeeton Click to read
Rohde & Schwarz integration with Adobe Premiere Pro
Ciaran Doran

Rohde & Schwarz SpycerNode storage & VENICE ingest are perfect partners for Adobe workflows

Tags: Rohde Schwarz | media | VENICE | SpycerNode | adobe | premier pro | Ciaran Doran
Contributing Author Ciaran Doran Click to read
Cloud integration: The only way is up
Francois Vaillant

In 2017 we saw the introduction of SMPTE 2110 and since then, the transition to IP has emerged as a priority for broadcasters looking to streamline their operations, decrease their footprint and effectively integrate with an industry in a rapid state of flux. A 2020 survey by Devoncroft found that almost 20% of broadcasters had already deployed SMPTE 2110, and over 25% were planning to do so. Then came the pandemic, precipitating the need for on-the-fly collaboration and accelerating the transition to remote, virtual and cloud production.

Tags: dejero | smpte 2110 | dazzl | streaming | Francois Vaillant
Contributing Author Francois Vaillant Click to read
The Cloud - a measured approach
Ciaran Doran

With the buzz of ‘cloud’ everywhere in our industry it would be natural to think that cloud is the only game in town. Isn’t it time to step back and consider very carefully how, or whether, you make that journey to the cloud?

Tags: cloud | rohde and schwarz | rohde | schwarz | Ciaran Doran
Contributing Author Ciaran Doran Click to read
Meeting the specification
Chris Smeeton

A good technical specification will detail precisely what is required, from the equipment to the cables connecting it. Many specifications will give  particular manufacturers and model numbers. On many occasions, this makes tendering simple and gives vendors a secure and fair way to bid.

Tags: CPR specification | argosy cable | fire safe cable | eu standard cable | chris smeeton | Chris Smeeton
Contributing Author Chris Smeeton Click to read