Building Blocks


Dick Hobbs. TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
by Dick Hobbs
Issue 112 - April 2016
risk

That is the MIT Media Lab saying, in a typically American academic way, that they want to help producers make better content. That is what you find if you Google "object-based broadcasting".

Which is what I did on your behalf this month, because BT Sport - which seems to have taken up the idea of innovation in broadcasting like its parent company has so signally failed to do with broadband delivery - has announced it is to experiment with object-based broadcasting.

So what does this new and slightly scary expression mean? Essentially, it means producing content as we do now, but instead of offering it to listeners neatly packaged up and ready to enjoy, it gets sent as a kit of parts for you to assemble as you wish.

To take a very simple example, think of the last match of the Six Nations. You might be irked that the commentators kept talking and you could never hear what referee Nigel Owens was saying, and you had a distinct impression that he was on top joking form. But the soundtrack was mixed in the back of the truck and you were stuck with the balance.

An object-oriented soundtrack would give you the commentators, the referee's microphone, the English fans and the French fans all as separate feeds and you get to mix your own sound as you want.

For a more complex example - but sticking with sound - BBC R&D commissioned a radio documentary called Responsive Radio (you can still hear it at www.bbc.co.uk/taster/projects/responsive-radio). The difference here is that you can choose how long a programme you want to listen to, but still get the same story. Tell it the length you want and it will be re-edited just for you, in real time, in your browser.

Apparently to achieve this needed 99 separate pieces of dialogue, 11 pieces of music and one seagull. And quite a complex map of all the links.

Now I'm going to let you into one of my most guilty secrets. I quite enjoy bits of Michael Portillo's social-history-by-riding-trains series. But the programmes are hugely infuriating in that a nominal half hour slot actually includes less than 20 minutes of content because it starts a great chunk of boilerplate about Bradshaw at the beginning, then a preview of the programme, then the journey for the week, then the journey for the day.

At the end of the programme you get the recap, then the preview of the next day's programme (frame for frame repeated at the beginning of that show). If there was a way of watching a week's worth in about 90 minutes without all the padding it would add immensely to my enjoyment.

The next step is to extend it from just the one stream to cover multiple devices. First, you could use responsive design to match the content to the screen, allowing you to choose big wide movie-style views for the living room television and much tighter framing on the phone (which also has stereo sound with the dialogue slightly forward for headphones in a potentially noisy environment).

Or you could provide different content to different devices simultaneously. Which is where BT Sport comes in, with its trial of object-based broadcasting on MotoGP coverage. The trial, incidentally, is part-funded by an EU research and innovation fund, in case that sways your referendum vote (either way).

What could this mean in practical terms?

One suggestion is that if you are binge-watching you do not need the recaps, so you could tell an object-based system that you are going to want to run the first episode straight into the second.

"When viewers are surround by a number of screens, how can they better make use of them?" said Andy Gower, head of interactive television research at BT. "How can the content be better exploited by those who are creating it?"

If it is going to work it has to be much more than just adding a second screen app. It has to be an intelligent use of the available screen real estate as well as giving the consumer the ability to control how much information they need, or indeed which view to take.

"Keeping things separate until they arrive a the viewer's device, rather than burning them all together, allows us to create a much more flexible experience," Gower said. "It is important that the director and producer feel very much in control and are crafting an experience - but one that works across multiple screens."

Will this collaboration between viewers and directors turn into a new and valuable way of engaging with audiences, or will it just be another science project that goes nowhere.

It remains to be seen. I cannot resist quoting the BBC's Matthew Brooks, though. "If we can send any object from a broadcast to any device, we could use every connected device in your home as a screen or a speaker," he wrote.

And added "I don't know about you, but I'm imagining the scariest episode of Doctor Who ever."

risk

Tags: iss112 | lego | MIT | dick hobbs | Dick Hobbs.
Contributing Author Dick Hobbs.

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • IMT Vislink HCAM 4k UHD transmitter at IBC 2018

    IMT Vislink HCAM 4k UHD transmitter at IBC 2018

  • Wireless Transmitters for Boxx TV at NAB 2018

    Wireless Transmitters for Boxx TV at NAB 2018

  • The CFU5 4k Transmitter from Vislink at IBC 2017

    The CFU5 4k Transmitter from Vislink at IBC 2017

  • Wireless 4K Transmitter from DTC Domo Broadcast at IBC 2017

    Wireless 4K Transmitter from DTC Domo Broadcast at IBC 2017

  • Smallest COFDM Transmitter from IMT-Solutions at NAB 2017

    Smallest COFDM Transmitter from IMT-Solutions at NAB 2017

  • Videosys Wireless Transmitters at BVE 2014

    Videosys Wireless Transmitters at BVE 2014

  • Cobham transmitters at IBC 2013

    Cobham transmitters at IBC 2013

  • Cobham: Mini RF Transmitters at NAB 2013

    Cobham: Mini RF Transmitters at NAB 2013

  • Cobham: RF Transmitter at NAB 2013

    Cobham: RF Transmitter at NAB 2013

  • Thear Technology Limited at BVE North 2012

    Thear Technology Limited at BVE North 2012

  • Thear Technology Limited at BVE 2012

    Thear Technology Limited at BVE 2012

  • Thear Technology Limited at ProVideo2011

    Thear Technology Limited at ProVideo2011

  • Boxx TV updates at NAB 2017

    Boxx TV updates at NAB 2017

  • Dejero at IBC 2016

    Dejero at IBC 2016

  • Media Links at IBC 2015

    Media Links at IBC 2015

  • AVIWEST at BVE 2015

    AVIWEST at BVE 2015

  • Thomson Broadcast at IBC 2014

    Thomson Broadcast at IBC 2014

  • AVIWEST at IBC 2014

    AVIWEST at IBC 2014

  • Cobham new receiver at IBC 2014

    Cobham new receiver at IBC 2014

  • Thomson Broadcast at NAB 2014

    Thomson Broadcast at NAB 2014

  • IMT at NAB 2014

    IMT at NAB 2014

  • Sennheiser HDM Pro at BVE 2014

    Sennheiser HDM Pro at BVE 2014

  • Dejero on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Dejero on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Nucomm on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Nucomm on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Cobham on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Cobham on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Anton Bauer at NAB 2012

    Anton Bauer at NAB 2012

  • Shure at BVE North 2011

    Shure at BVE North 2011


Related Shows
  • User review of the Hollyland MARS 400S PRO Wireless Video Transmission System

    User review of the Hollyland MARS 400S PRO Wireless Video Transmission System


Articles
A Broadcasters Guide to Microservices
Roger Persson

The word “microservices” has been creeping into the conversation about software-centric systems recently. Is it really a different approach, what does it mean, and what are the advantages?

Tags: nxt edition | microservices | modular software | Roger Persson
Contributing Author Roger Persson Click to read
Streaming Technologies Explained
Bruce Devlin - new

The word streaming can relate to different technologies from different manufacturers in different scenarios and in this short article we are going to take a little tour of what it all means. 

Tags: mr mxf | streaming | hls | dash | cmaf | mpeg | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new Click to read
REVIEW - Hollyland MARS 400S PRO Digital Wireless Transmission System
Phil Vinter

Built by Hollyland and costing around £600 the Mars 400S is an easy-to-use wireless video transmitter/receiver system – it will be right up the alley of anyone who, like me, considers an instruction manual to be nothing more than box padding.

Read Phils Full review here, and link to the video review.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | MARS 400 | wireless | tx | rx | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read
HOLLYLAND LARK 150 Review
Phil Vinter

The exponential growth of video supercharged a technological revolution that began in the early noughties with the advent of DSLR cameras.
The cinematic-style shallow depth of field image video quality from DSLRs was a revelation, but, back then audio was the big drawback. As demand has grown so the technology has improved and today’s one-man-band small rig set ups can capture pretty good sound into a DSLR style camera.

Phil Vinter reviews the latest release from HOLLYLAND and it's a thumbs up from us.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | radio mic | audio | LARK-150 | CVP | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read
How to successfully buy AV and Broadcast Equipment at Auction
Dan Main

Perhaps you wouldn't expect an auctioneer to tell you this - but yes, there are risks to buying equipment at auction; just probably not the risks that you think.

So what are the real risks to buying at auction, and how can they be managed?

To watch the interview with Dan please click here

Tags: auction | tips | buying at an auction | fraud | auction risks | Dan Main
Contributing Author Dan Main Click to read