Challenging Loudness


Numerous definitions of the word loudness exist but to understand the relevance of the word in relation to the world of broadcast sound perhaps the statement that loudness is “our perceived impression of the intensity, frequency, and duration of a sound” fits closest. We all watch TV with the remote control close at hand; not just to change channel but more often than not, to ride the volume control because programme and commercial loudness varies from show to show, channel to channel.
Simply put, the difference between peak and loudness is that a peak reading indicates the maximum level present in a signal whereas loudness is the sum of the audible energy within that signal, as perceived by the human ear. By manipulating the dynamic range of audio to maximise loudness energy without affecting peak levels, commercial producers have been able to ensure that their advertisements are louder than the TV programmes they interrupt.
On December 2nd 2010 in the US, the C.A.L.M. (Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation) Act was passed by the US Senate; it will become law 12 months after the Act is signed by President Obama. With an ATSC Committee advising the Federal Government on the detail of the legislation in conjunction with the production of its own set of practices “Techniques for Establishing and Maintaining Audio Loudness for Digital Television" or A/85 for short, it appears that America will be one of the first nations to be subject to regulation.
On this side of the Atlantic, the EBU has set up a similar taskforce (P/LOUD) whose R128 document sets out to provide a blueprint of recommended practices for “Loudness in Broadcasting”. The ATSC and EBU committees have set out to reach the same fundamental goal with their respective conclusions, both adopting the ITU-R BS1770 loudness algorithm as the agreed standard for measurement.
In practical terms, the new regulations and ITU-R BS1770 mean significant changes to the way audio is measured throughout the broadcast infrastructure. Measuring loudness instead of peak level is a sea change in the way the sound engineer at the front end of the broadcast signal chain works. Whilst continuing to monitor levels using traditional metering solutions at the mixing console, the engineer now needs to keep one eye on a continuous readout of average programme loudness. Of course this is a very simple summarisation of a complicated scenario where the ‘deliverable’ in real terms may include alternative mixes for international customers (with different loudness delivery criteria), stereo versions, clean mixes, etc. Add to that the fact that encoding to Dolby E or delivering discrete multichannel audio with metadata means that target loudness, dialogue normalisation, downmix and dynamic range control parameters must all co-exist and comply for the audio to reach its final destination in the form in which it is intended.
Advisory bodies such as the DTV Audio Group strongly suggest that broadcasters ensure that programme content is acquired, edited and delivered with compliant loudness settings. This isn’t something that can be achieved overnight and certainly the expectation that audio professionals learn to mix to a target number rather than a meter can only be achieved with training and investment in the proper tools to perform the job.
Legacy content, library material and programmes from unregulated sources will not necessarily meet with nationally or self-regulated loudness criteria. A degree of processing is unavoidable when considering the latter but ideally this will not be performed at the point of transmission. Older material alongside current project work can be processed in the file-based domain using one of a number of Loudness correcting software applications now available to Video and Audio Post Producers.
Over time, as older programmes undergo loudness processing and digitisation, and with new content meeting either ATSC or EBU recommendations, the aspiration for the global community is that the worldwide library of broadcast content will become ‘standardised’ with only subtle variations. In the meantime it is incumbent upon systems integrators, manufacturers and broadcasters alike to embrace good loudness practice, to educate one another and to ease the transition from the disparate model of old to common and consistent broadcast sound, worldwide.

Tags: iss053 | loudness | tsl | calm | c.a.l.m | bx1770 | itu-r | p/loud | r128 | dtv audio group | N/A
Contributing Author N/A

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

    NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

  • Nugen Audio Loudness Meter, Halo Upmix and Halo Downmix at NAB 2018

    Nugen Audio Loudness Meter, Halo Upmix and Halo Downmix at NAB 2018

  • Nugen Audio Loudness Toolkit at BVE 2016

    Nugen Audio Loudness Toolkit at BVE 2016

  • NUGEN Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2015

    NUGEN Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2015

  • TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

    TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

  • TSL Products at NAB 2013

    TSL Products at NAB 2013

  • TSL Systems at BVE 2013

    TSL Systems at BVE 2013

  • TSL Products at BVE 2013

    TSL Products at BVE 2013

  • TSL at BVE 2012

    TSL at BVE 2012

  • Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

    Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

  • Emotion Systems at NAB 2012

    Emotion Systems at NAB 2012

  • DK-Technologies at NAB 2012

    DK-Technologies at NAB 2012

  • Junger Audio at IBC2011

    Junger Audio at IBC2011

  • The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

    The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

  • Wohler at IBC 2016

    Wohler at IBC 2016

  • NUGEN Audio at IBC 2015

    NUGEN Audio at IBC 2015

  • NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

    NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

  • RTW at IBC 2014

    RTW at IBC 2014

  • RTW at NAB 2014

    RTW at NAB 2014

  • Cobalt Digital at NAB 2014

    Cobalt Digital at NAB 2014

  • RTW at IBC 2013

    RTW at IBC 2013

  • NuGen Audio at IBC 2013

    NuGen Audio at IBC 2013

  • RTW at NAB 2012

    RTW at NAB 2012

  • Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

    Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

  • Qualis at NAB 2012

    Qualis at NAB 2012

  • Sonifex at BVE 2012

    Sonifex at BVE 2012

  • Emotion Systems at BVE 2012

    Emotion Systems at BVE 2012

  • HHB and TC Electronic at BVE North2011

    HHB and TC Electronic at BVE North2011

  • Volicon at IBC2011

    Volicon at IBC2011

  • TC Electronic at IBC2011

    TC Electronic at IBC2011

  • Cobalt Digital at IBC2011

    Cobalt Digital at IBC2011

  • RTW at IBC2011

    RTW at IBC2011

  • DK Technology at IBC2011

    DK Technology at IBC2011

  • Linear Acoustic at IBC2011

    Linear Acoustic at IBC2011

  • The Latest Production Control Solution from TSL Products at IBC 2018

    The Latest Production Control Solution from TSL Products at IBC 2018

  • Latest audio product updates from TSL Products at IBC 2018

    Latest audio product updates from TSL Products at IBC 2018

  • PAM-IP and ST-2110 support from TSL at NAB 2018

    PAM-IP and ST-2110 support from TSL at NAB 2018

  • TSL Products PAM1, SAM1 and PAM PiCo at IBC 2013

    TSL Products PAM1, SAM1 and PAM PiCo at IBC 2013

  • TSL Products at IBC 2013

    TSL Products at IBC 2013

  • TSL Systems at IBC 2013

    TSL Systems at IBC 2013

  • TSL Systems at NAB 2013

    TSL Systems at NAB 2013

  • TSL Systems at IBC 2012

    TSL Systems at IBC 2012

  • TSL Products at IBC 2012

    TSL Products at IBC 2012

  • TSL at NAB 2012

    TSL at NAB 2012

  • TSL at BVE 2012

    TSL at BVE 2012

  • TSL at IBC2011

    TSL at IBC2011


Related Shows
  • TSL Produts on the sofa at BVE

    TSL Produts on the sofa at BVE


Articles
Your two week editing future
Alex Macleod

So here we are - January again! Usually a good time to reflect on the year just gone by, and a good time to look forward to the coming months as the new year begins.

When I was reflecting on my 2018, and when thinking about what to write for my first article for Kit Plus - I kept coming back to one theme - organisation.

Tags: iss135 | editing | mediacity training | premiere pro | dit | Alex Macleod
Contributing Author Alex Macleod Click to read or download PDF
Test, Measurement and Standards
Alan Wheable The Alliance for IP Media Solutions (AIMS), is a non-profit trade alliance that fosters the adoption of one set of common, ubiquitous, standards-based protocols for interoperability over IP in the media and entertainment, and professional audio/video industries.
Tags: iss135 | omnitek | aims | SNMP | hdr | ai | Alan Wheable
Contributing Author Alan Wheable Click to read or download PDF
The making of The Heist
Tom Hutchings Shine TV has never been one to shy away from a challenge, be that in terms of using new technologies, filming ideas or overall formats: we pride ourselves on being ambitious and risk-takers.
Tags: iss135 | liveu | heist | streaming | cellular | mobile | connectivity | Tom Hutchings
Contributing Author Tom Hutchings Click to read or download PDF
Grading BBC Sounds
Simone Grattarola

The BBC has launched its new personalised music, radio and podcast app with a campaign that follows one listener’s journey from meeting Kylie Minogue in a lift to Idris Elba on a bus. 

BBC Sounds offers a single home for the BBC’s thousands of hours of audio content, including live and on-demand shows and special music mixes curated by artists.

BBC Creative, the broadcaster’s in-house creative division, took the brief to agency Riff Raff Films and Megaforce directing duo of Charles Brisgand and Raphaël Rodriguez who in turn brought on board regular collaborators Time Based Arts.

Tags: iss135 | bbc | grading | bbc sounds | davinici | resolve | blackmagic | editing | Simone Grattarola
Contributing Author Simone Grattarola Click to read or download PDF
21st Century Technology for 20th Century Content
James Hall A big challenge facing owners of legacy content is rationalising and archiving their tape and film-based media in cost effective and efficient ways, whilst also adding value. Normally the result of this is to find a low cost means of digitising the content – usually leaving them with a bunch of assets on HDD. But then what? How can content owners have their cake and eat it?
Tags: iss135 | legacy | digitising | digitizing | archive | James Hall
Contributing Author James Hall Click to read or download PDF