Class: Do we still need standards


Bruce Devlin - new TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online

On the 1st January 2018, I officially took on the post of SMPTE Standards Vice President. The role has responsibility for all of SMPTE’s standardisation activities and it fills me with equal measures of excitement and terror.

A big thank you to Alan Lambshead who, after 4 years as Standards Vice President is handing over the post to me. I think it is entirely fitting that mid-way through Alan’s final set of Face-to-Face meetings we see the publication of SMPTE ST2110. And many within the industry see this new standard as a turning point towards a new IT based future.

So, what exactly is a standard and why is it important that ST 2110 is more than a white paper published on a few vendors’ websites?

A standard

As a Cambridge man, I found the Cambridge English Dictionary definitions of the word standard are:

(countable noun) level of quality.
e.g. We have very high safety standards in this laboratory.

(countable noun) a pattern or model that is generally accepted.
e.g. This program is an industry standard for computers.

(countable noun) a pattern or model that is generally accepted.
e.g. This program is an industry standard for computers.

(adjective) usual rather than special, especially when thought of as being correct or acceptable.
e.g. These are standard procedures for handling radioactive waste.

SMPTE standards and the processes to make them embody the ideas of quality, correct and accepted. This is where some of the friction arises in this new software world we live in. I hear many people asking for the standards process to be quicker and for it to be more thorough and more accurate and for the resulting documents to be free. These are all great ideals, but they are conflicting requirements.

If you have read this far in the article, then I am sure that you have found yourself in a room with smart people who have firmly held, but differing opinions on some technical issue. It could be “should we optimise for speed of writing the specification or speed of building the resulting product?” It could be “do we prioritise low latency or low complexity in the design?”. These types of trade offs do not have a universal correct answer and smart people with differing vested interests need to compromise if these issues come up during the creation of a standard.

Making the mechanics of a standardisation process fast is unlikely to magically get an accepted agreement between groups of different vested interests. The best result is usually a quality compromise between the parties because that will maximise the number of implementations of the standard and will very often lead to the biggest industry built upon that standard because the standard will become the accepted way.

The SMPTE standards process, by design, is thorough. This means scrutiny at the most minute level of detail of what is written so that the standard itself can act as a bedrock upon which systems with long term stability can be built. A standard that is rushed and incomplete does not give good interoperability and ultimately will detract from SMPTE’s reputation for quality and reliability.

As we start 2018, you will start to see some activity on a new SMPTE specifications initiative that is being trialled with the UK’s Digital Production Partnership. The goal is to create a nimble process in which SMPTE’s resources can be used to create business-driven specifications that constrain the heavy weight standards that SMPTE is renowned for.

Specifications allow a core standard, like ST 2110, to be used very differently in different scenarios. The USA with fractional frame rates will have different core constraints than the UK with integer frame rates. Countries with right-to-left non-Latin scripts will have different captioning and subtitling requirements to North America.

Using Specifications to constrain standards for local cultures and working practises has been one of the keys to the success of Film and TV over the years. We hope that this specifications trial will encourage organisations to approach SMPTE for the publishing and long-term memory of their increasingly diverse range of Specifications.

I am honoured and flattered to have been elected to the post of Standards Vice President and I hope that I can bring to the standards community some of the enthusiasm and passion that I have for this industry of ours.


Tags: iss129 | smpte | st2110 | dpp | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • SMPTE 2110, UHD and HDR solutions from Phabrix at NAB 2019

    SMPTE 2110, UHD and HDR solutions from Phabrix at NAB 2019

  • PHABRIX QXIP support for SMPTE 2110

    PHABRIX QXIP support for SMPTE 2110

  • SMPTE on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    SMPTE on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • IP, 3G-SDI + HDR generation, analysis and monitoring from Phabrix NAB 2017

    IP, 3G-SDI + HDR generation, analysis and monitoring from Phabrix NAB 2017

  • Argosy at IBC2011

    Argosy at IBC2011

  • PixelPower offers ST2110 Streamaster and Gallion at IBC 2019

    PixelPower offers ST2110 Streamaster and Gallion at IBC 2019

  • Telestream Vantage support for DPP at IBC 2014

    Telestream Vantage support for DPP at IBC 2014

  • Wohler DPP at BVE 2014

    Wohler DPP at BVE 2014

  • WohlerGateway at IBC 2014

    WohlerGateway at IBC 2014

  • Front Porch Digital at IBC 2014

    Front Porch Digital at IBC 2014

  • Telestream Wirecast and Switch at IBC 2014

    Telestream Wirecast and Switch at IBC 2014

  • Wohler MPEG Monitoring at BVE 2014

    Wohler MPEG Monitoring at BVE 2014


Related Shows
  • Day 5 of BroadcastShow at IBC

    Day 5 of BroadcastShow at IBC


Articles
Original KVM or KVM over IP
Jochen Bauer Will the technology used in broadcasting solely consist of IP devices? For years, IP has been entering all areas of life. Especially control room applications as they are typically deployed in broadcasting benefit from the IP revolution in many ways. But an “IP-only broadcast world” is not yet here. Nevertheless, the trend clearly moves towards IP transmission, even though a large part of content production still uses traditional transmission paths. And therefore we continue to live in a hybrid world, using both original and IP-based technology. KVM experts Guntermann und Drunck still rely on both original KVM and KVM-over-IP™ to be able to offer their customers the best of both worlds.
Tags: iss139 | kvm | gdsys | guntermann and drunck | kvm-over-ip | Jochen Bauer
Contributing Author Jochen Bauer Click to read or download PDF
Keeping the Show on the Road
Andy McKenzie There is long-established saying in the media business that, if something goes wrong, at least nobody dies. It is almost true unless you happen to be a TV producer suffering a cardiac arrest because your primary video feed has gone blank during a high-budget programme.
Tags: iss139 | service | support | finepoint | maintenance | Andy McKenzie
Contributing Author Andy McKenzie Click to read or download PDF
Why MADI is Still Relevant
Stephen Brownsill While the original idea for MADI was to cater to a very narrow recording studio application, the standard remains a viable go-to multichannel audio technology. Beginning as a standard in 1991, MADI was first introduced to the world as digital production was beginning to come of age. MADI was put together in 1988 by Solid State Logic, AMS-Neve, Sony (DASH) and Mitsubishi (ProDigi) as a way to transport up to 56 channels of digital audio between large-format audio consoles of the day and digital multi-channel tape machines via 75-Ohm coaxial cables. Both tape-based machines have long since disappeared from the equipment landscape.
Tags: iss139 | madi | tsl products | aes10 | aes | dolby atmos | st-2110 | sam-q | Stephen Brownsill
Contributing Author Stephen Brownsill Click to read or download PDF
The Future of Broadcast Connectivity
Jamie Adkin The use of KVM equipment has been essential to meet the evolving needs of the broadcast industry for many years. Over that time, many in the industry have recognised the importance of using IP-enabled KVM to break down technological barriers and enable real-time access to visuals wherever and whenever they’re needed. These components are vital parts in live production environments in particular.
Tags: iss139 | adder | kvm | ip kvm | Jamie Adkin
Contributing Author Jamie Adkin Click to read or download PDF
Keeping Pace with the Content Revolution
Kevin Fitzgerald These are uniquely challenging times for broadcasters and their technical teams. Not only are they having to negotiate the move to IP-based infrastructures and the introduction of new formats and techniques such as 4K and HDR, they are also having to generate more content than ever before to support OTT and web services as well as traditional linear broadcast.
Tags: iss139 | streamstar | streaming | case 800 | ipx | ipx-3g | Kevin Fitzgerald
Contributing Author Kevin Fitzgerald Click to read or download PDF