Exceptional loudness control does not have to break the bank


Oliver Masciarotte TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
by Oliver Masciarotte, Director of Customer Experience, Minnetonka Audio Software
The industry is buzzing about loudness control. It is perhaps the most important audio issue facing broadcasters today because governments have mandated change. EBU R128 and other such legislation around the world attempts to provide some level of consistency in perceived loudness between a program and its interstitials, hence the concept of loudness control.
Because loudness is based on perception — how loud the volume seems to the average listener — it is by nature difficult to control, especially while trying to maintain the artistry that went into it. You can’t simply apply a real-time compander or limiter to the problem because people will notice a difference in quality.
We now live in a file–based digital world, and real-time dynamics represent an analog way of thinking. Digital TV is capable of delivering much better quality than analog systems of the past. As more consumers watch higher quality video on ever larger screens with higher fidelity audio, they are adjusting their expectations upward to match. Broadcasters who believe that those consumers don’t care about audio do so at their own peril.
The specs and recommended practices tell us that the best way to manage loudness is in a file-based environment where you can see the entire duration of a program and make decisions based on the overall program. It’s something you simply cannot do in a real-time environment, where only a few seconds of audio can be analyzed at a time. Hardware dynamics should come into play only as a last resort; if audio engineers do their jobs correctly, hardware dynamics will remain idle.
Even to an untrained ear listening to a tiny rear-facing speaker on the back of a TV, there is a clear difference between sound that has been processed using standard loudness-control methodology and sound that has been processed with a file-based method. For people who listen through a “home theater,” which is common in many households today, the disparity is even more pronounced. At the other extreme are viewers who watch on their mobile or hand-held devices, which are usually incapable of supporting high fidelity. Broadcasters must carefully tailor PCM essence, even if it’s been lossy encoded or wrapped in a container, to make sure it works across all media and platforms.
In the end, it all comes down to producer’s intent. Standard methods tend to compromise the artistic intent of the audio because they make loud section quieter and vice versa, squashing the dynamic range. The result is bland audio that’s inconsistent with what is happening on screen. When that happens, people start to notice and it ultimately affects the content provider’s brand.
Despite the shortcomings, broadcasters have been slow to adopt file-based loudness management, perhaps as a matter of budget or convenience. To be sure, implementing an effective audio loudness solution using the industry’s video-oriented processes is too expensive for many operations. But now technology exists that takes decades worth of loudness management expertise and distills it into a turnkey, file-based software solution that offers a user-optimized answer to intelligent loudness management. It looks at an entire program and automatically makes decisions about how best to process the audio based on parameters that the engineer has set.
The technology consists of industry-standard methods and proprietary algorithms that combine in unique ways depending on the job at hand. The resulting quality is far better than what would come from real-time tools and video-oriented processes. Because it is file-based, it not only can run faster than real time, but also complies with the government directive to look at the entire program rather than short duration windows of time. Because it is purely software, the technology can be updated at any time and therefore is continuously compliant. And because it’s SOAP standards–driven automation, it slots into existing video infrastructure without requiring an audio-savvy tech to run it.
Perhaps one of the best things about a software-based, file-based loudness measurement solution is that the cost of entry is low, putting it within the reach of even the smallest broadcasters. For about the same price as a piece of real-time hardware — and at least half as much as equivalent file-based video-processing systems — a broadcaster could go a long way toward ensuring compliance and quality. And when you consider the potential penalties, that’s definitely money well spent.

Tags: iss077 | loudness control | Minnetonka Audio Software | cheap | EBU R128 | Oliver Masciarotte | software based | Oliver Masciarotte
Contributing Author Oliver Masciarotte

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

    Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

  • TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

    TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

  • NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

    NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013


Related Shows
  • Social Distance KIP Boom or Interview Poles and Stingray Audio Bags with K-Tek

    Social Distance KIP Boom or Interview Poles and Stingray Audio Bags with K-Tek


Articles
Avid and Rohde & Schwarz
Ciaran Doran

Rohde & Schwarz is the perfect ingest partner to build flexible workflows with Avid.

Tags: Rohde and Schwarz | avid | spycernode | editing | asset management | venice | Ciaran Doran
Contributing Author Ciaran Doran Click to read
Sennheiser MKE 400 hands on review and test
KitPlus

Sennheiser have just released two products aimed at simplifying audio on the move, the MKE400 shotgun microphone and the XS Lav Mic, in this review we’re looking at the MKE400.

Tags: sennheiser mke400 | sennheiser mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 quality | best microphones for youtube | mic for youtube videos | sennheiser mke 400 hands on | microphone review | iphone videography | microphones | sound for video | camera microphone | microphone for iphone | microphone for youtube | video microphone | shotgun mics | smartphone microphone | vlogging mic | best microphone for video | shotgun microphone review | mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 hands on review | sennheiser mke 400 test | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read
A Broadcasters Guide to Microservices
Roger Persson

The word “microservices” has been creeping into the conversation about software-centric systems recently. Is it really a different approach, what does it mean, and what are the advantages?

Tags: nxt edition | microservices | modular software | Roger Persson
Contributing Author Roger Persson Click to read
Streaming Technologies Explained
Bruce Devlin - new

The word streaming can relate to different technologies from different manufacturers in different scenarios and in this short article we are going to take a little tour of what it all means. 

Tags: mr mxf | streaming | hls | dash | cmaf | mpeg | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new Click to read
REVIEW - Hollyland MARS 400S PRO Digital Wireless Transmission System
Phil Vinter

Built by Hollyland and costing around £600 the Mars 400S is an easy-to-use wireless video transmitter/receiver system – it will be right up the alley of anyone who, like me, considers an instruction manual to be nothing more than box padding.

Read Phils Full review here, and link to the video review.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | MARS 400 | wireless | tx | rx | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read