Gaining insight in a fragmented broadcast world


Keith Bedford TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
by Keith Bedford
Issue 110 - February 2016

The proliferation of mobile devices, on-demand content and the fragmentation of viewing habits makes the task of measuring TV audiences and the level of audience participation a bigger challenge than ever before. While the ways that consumers' access content may have changed radically, broadcasters' need for an accurate view of who is watching what, when and how haven't.

For the broadcasters and advertisers alike, the ability to accurately receive viewing figures is vital, as this information is the mechanism that ultimately drives revenue via advertising spend. Major shows and prime time slots command premium rates, for example ITV's X Factor Finals reportedly receiving six figure sums for 30 seconds of advertising. In order for the broadcaster to recognise this revenue potential, the advertisers need to know they are hitting the right demographic and are looking for minimal wastage, i:e where their campaign hits a demographic that its product is of no interest to. Whether a particular show is getting as many eyeballs as possible is important, but from an advertising perspective it is just as important that they are the eyes of their key target audience.

Non-linear viewing is now on the increase, with non-traditional TV viewing said to make up one-in-five TV minutes, therefore it is important to be able to accurately report this data in order to realise the potential revenue it could yield.

Since the early eighties, the Broadcasters' Audience Research Board (BARB) has been delivering the official viewing figures for UK television audiences. BARB has traditionally dealt with linear data and information that could be reported as one, which meant for a comprehensive analysis. The linear information collated by BARB was constantly received by way of their BARB panels, selected households who agreed to have a set-top box that accurately reports each family member's viewing habits. The introduction of non-linear viewing presents its own set of challenges, although viewing of this kind is often €œconnected€ and therefore easier to gather viewing data, systems are not set up for this non-linear information. The issue is not that linear and non-linear are difficult to report on in isolation, there simply hasn't been the infrastructure to support reporting for both.

A common ground had to be reached where the analysis of the two delivery methods could be combined. This meant looking at the whole picture, including tracking time-shifted viewing for up to 28 days after a programme has aired.

In order to address the changing landscape of where and how consumers view content, BARB announced Project Dovetail (PD). PD offers the ability to measure the performance of non-linear viewing of content, this data can then be blended with traditional linear viewing information collated from the BARB panel, to form a comprehensive analysis. This provides reports on not only what was watched but by whom and on which kind of device.

In October, the TV Player Report was released by BARB as the first output from PD reporting on multi-screen viewing on laptop/desktop PCs, tablets and smartphones focusing on activity at device level, rather than at person level. Using this information, the next initiative from PD is to blend the linear data from the BARB panel, with the analytics from non-linear to create the comprehensive cross-platform measurement that accommodates the shift in viewing.

The accuracy of all of this reporting, albeit linear or non-linear, is wholly reliant on the programme information being correct in the first place. The TV listings have to be accurate or the whole process will have been in vain. It is all very well being able to produce viewing figures, but it is imperative that those figures are reporting the activity of the correct programmes.

EBS currently supplies OFCOM and a number of BARB bureaux, who rely on EBS to provide high quality, accurate TV listing data, recognising the vital role it plays in the process as a whole. EBS maintains relationships with broadcasters in the UK and Ireland, receiving schedule data for over 700 channels, before augmenting it with extra metadata such as cast, director or year of production. Updates and amendments are all processed as a matter of priority ensuring that its data, and in turn the data of its customers is absolutely precise.


Tags: iss110 | ebs | pawa | mobile | barb | ofcom | listing data | Keith Bedford
Contributing Author Keith Bedford

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • EBS at IBC 2015

    EBS at IBC 2015

  • EBS at IBC 2014

    EBS at IBC 2014

  • NewTek TalkShow at IBC 2014

    NewTek TalkShow at IBC 2014

  • Sonnet Technologies demo a mobile workstation for editing in the field at IBC 2018

    Sonnet Technologies demo a mobile workstation for editing in the field at IBC 2018

  • Broadcasters mobile phone rack with HD voice from Glensound at IBC 2018

    Broadcasters mobile phone rack with HD voice from Glensound at IBC 2018

  • Mobile Connectivity with Dejero GateWay at NAB 2018

    Mobile Connectivity with Dejero GateWay at NAB 2018

  • Mobile comms from Clear-Com with LQV4 software and Agent-IC shown at BVE 2018

    Mobile comms from Clear-Com with LQV4 software and Agent-IC shown at BVE 2018

  • Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

    Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

  • Soliton Zao at IBC 2016

    Soliton Zao at IBC 2016

  • Glensound Expedition at IBC 2015

    Glensound Expedition at IBC 2015

  • Studio Technologies at NAB 2014

    Studio Technologies at NAB 2014

  • Dejero at NAB 2014

    Dejero at NAB 2014

  • Glensound: RECCE HD at NAB 2013

    Glensound: RECCE HD at NAB 2013

  • Visionary Solutions at NAB 2013

    Visionary Solutions at NAB 2013

  • Yospace: Advert Insertion at NAB 2013

    Yospace: Advert Insertion at NAB 2013

  • Glensound at BVE 2013

    Glensound at BVE 2013

  • YoSpace at NAB 2012

    YoSpace at NAB 2012

  • Volicon at IBC2011

    Volicon at IBC2011

  • SMPTE on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    SMPTE on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013


Related Shows
  • JOBY GorillaPod Vlogging Kit reviewed

    JOBY GorillaPod Vlogging Kit reviewed


Articles
The Future of Broadcast Technology
Sebastian Richter

Spotlight on Sebastian Richter, Vice President Media Systems at Rohde & Schwarz.

We are currently in the middle of a transition phase with migration to several new technologies, from the move to IP-based infrastructure and the shift from linear to video-on-demand (VOD).
The question for all of us is how long that transition phase will last; it is going to be faster for some customers then for others – national broadcasters, for example – it will be a slower process.

Tags: broadcast | 5g | 5g broadcast | rohde and schwarz | Sebastian Richter
Contributing Author Sebastian Richter Click to read
Spotlight on James Gilbert, Director of Product and Solution Management
James Gilbert

Over the next eight years we are going to be in transition, and within that there will be vastly different rates of change among content owners and media organisations. As a technology provider the onus is on us to be flexible and adaptable to meet this wide range of requirements from our customers.

Tags: | James Gilbert
Contributing Author James Gilbert Click to read
Spotlight on Karl Mehring, Director of Professional Services, Broadcast, Amplifier and Media
Karl Mehring

How has the role of Professional Services evolved in recent years and what vision do you have of the broadcast technology business? Covering new opportunities that the move to remote brings, new technologies such as 5G broadcast & the impact on the broadcast industry, and the challenges for broadcasters and how can they overcome them.

Tags: COTS | cloud | remote production | distribution | 5g broadcast | Karl Mehring
Contributing Author Karl Mehring Click to read
The Future of Broadcast Technology
Manfred Reitmeier

Now that OTT and VOD have become more mainstream, many commentators talk about traditional broadcast methods, like terrestrial transmission, being a thing of the past. With so many new platforms and non-traditional content services carving out a growing slice of the market, you can be forgiven for thinking that linear over-the-air television is on its way out. The reality is that the industry must strike a balance between meeting consumers’ shifting habits and the business and operational needs of content providers.

Tags: Rohde Schwarz | 5g broadcast | Manfred Reitmeier
Contributing Author Manfred Reitmeier Click to read
A switch in time: how KVM can unlock the future of broadcasting
Chris Smeeton

One of the major changes for broadcasters during the pandemic has been the shift towards remote production; by no means a new phenomenon in an IP environment, yet accelerated under lockdown to accommodate travel and gathering restrictions. A 2021 report found that almost 40% of broadcast professionals now employ remote production, up 9% on the previous year.

Tags: KVM | ARGOSY | GDSYS | KVM Tech | Chris Smeeton
Contributing Author Chris Smeeton Click to read