Modern Test Techniques for Digital Audio Broadcast Systems


The move to digital systems in broadcast audio means that engineers and systems integrators have had to evolve new means of testing equipment. Simon Woollard, Applications Engineer for audio test and measurement manufacturer Prism Sound, discusses some of the issues faced by today’s broadcast engineers.

The Aims
In terms of audio performance, the broadcaster’s aim is to deliver high quality, intelligible audio, free from undesirable noise and distortion, and a robust service free from intermittent faults. There are, broadly-speaking, three areas of concern here:
1) Characterising components and systems within the pre-transmission path
2) Verifying the complete signal path from source to customer
3) Long-term reliability issues – preventing audible ‘pops’ and ‘glitches’
Each of these areas brings unique challenges, and we will deal with them in turn, paying attention to the implications for audio test instrumentation.
1) Performance of Audio Components and Systems
The aim here is to ensure that equipment installed in the broadcast signal path is fit for purpose and functioning correctly. The introduction of digital audio storage and transmission has brought with it new challenges, and checking signals with headphones is no longer sufficient!

The Audio Engineering Society (AES) developed and published the AES17 recommendations specifically for testing digital audio equipment. Despite broad awareness of the AES/EBU interface, better known as AES3-2003, AES17 appears to be generally not well known. A personal copy can be obtained from www.aes.org, and a useful one-sheet summary is available at www.prismsound.com/AES17.

More on AES17
AES17 aims to provide a consistent methodology for manufacturers and system builders. The AES17 recommendations cover A-A, A-D, D-D and D-A testing, and there are several common considerations across these various modes:
Input characteristics
Output characteristics
Linear response
Amplitude linearity
Signal-to-noise ratio
Crosstalk
The challenge for broadcasters here is time; large systems with many components, modes of operation and channels can be time consuming to test. It is not always necessary, however, to perform all of these tests. It is reasonable to select a relevant and useful sub-set to prove basic performance, for example, and to state 'measured in accordance with AES17'.
Test Equipment
Broadcasters may have their own performance criteria for audio equipment, or devices may be checked against manufacturer’s specifications before being commissioned. Either way, an audio test system is needed for analysis. An internet search for "digital audio analyzer" will produce a good selection, including systems with analogue functionality.

Digital-only tests are also available, and there are several portable analyzers on the market. "AES3 interface analyzer" is a good search string for browsing the available options. Particularly important in any equipment is the need to test the performance of the AES3 interface itself. The key requirement is the ability to measure not just jitter, but the ability to separate Fs-jitter (source-related) from data-jitter (cable-related) components – vital to determine whether a measured problem is due to a source, cabling, or both.
Automation is a key requirement if large-scale testing is to be efficiently deployed. Prism Sound provides automated tools which can run individual AES17 tests or comprehensive test routines from no more than a mouse click, greatly simplifying the task of testing.

2) Performance Experienced by the Customer
Audio quality needs to be monitored from the perspective of customer experience, but in addition, minimum performance limits also often form part of contractual obligations for service providers, re-enforcing the need to evaluate live broadcast quality.

Measuring Live Broadcast Performance
In order to reliably measure performance metrics such as noise, distortion, crosstalk and amplitude response, test tones are needed. But test tones are objectionable to listen to, so their use in live broadcast is typically restricted to as little as a second or two during the night – and this does not give sufficient time for traditional test techniques.

Multi-tone Testing
Multi-tone signals consist of many sinusoidal tones playing simultaneously, a technique simply not practical with discrete analogue oscillators. By careful design of the tone components in software or DSP, and using digital frequency domain analysis, we can analyze not only the tones themselves, yielding frequency response information, but we can also analyze the ‘gaps’ between tones, yielding noise, distortion and crosstalk responses from the same measurement.
A traditional sinusoidal frequency response sweep could take tens of seconds to complete. Contrast this with a multi-tone measurement which can yield frequency response in addition to noise, distortion, crosstalk and more, and which can execute in a fraction of a second! This technique is ideally suited to live broadcast analysis where test times are critical.
An article entitled “Testing Live Broadcasts” on www.prismsound.com elaborates on the theory behind multi-tone testing, and a “Transmission Monitoring Script” employing multi-tones is available to download.
Analysis Automation
In order to cover the territory of a broadcast network and to ensure reliable and repeatable results, there is a need to automate receiver-end testing. A live broadcast test system therefore ideally needs to automatically:
Detect the onset of test tones to trigger testing
Perform analysis once the tones are detected
Determine whether the analysis results are acceptable
Transmit a test report to a human operator
This sounds complex, but the age of the digital audio analyzer makes this all possible. Prism Sound has delivered ready-made broadcast test solutions that achieve this degree of specialization, right down to sending automated email reports to engineering staff. Only in recent times, with the advent of the digital audio analyzer, has this level of sophistication been available “off the shelf”.
3) Long Term Reliability
Shortcomings of Audio Tests
There are limitations to the tests we have discussed so far: Results are valid at a single moment in time, but this does not guarantee trouble-free performance over the longer term. Reliability tests should be included as part of the signal chain commissioning process to ensure robust service, and care should be taken in specifying test equipment that includes this functionality.
Signal Path Tests
An important consideration for digital audio systems is the need to characterise the carrier signal separately from the audio data. Unlike analogue, the quality of digital audio does not degrade gracefully or progressively. As the carrier degrades, audio transmission will suddenly fail, leading to audible pops and glitches. A system close to failure may be forced over the edge by something as simple as flicking a light switch. So not only are we looking for reliability in terms of audio performance, but also in terms of maintaining a margin of safety to allow for unpredictable events.

The analysis functionality required for reliability testing includes:
  • Audio data integrity
  • Digital carrier Amplitude
  • Jitter (Fs and data jitter)
  • Jitter spectrum
  • Bit activity
  • Digital frame rate & frame rate accuracy
  • Channel status implementation
  • Receiver susceptibility to degraded carriers
  • Limit checking / event log
The simplest way to test the integrity of a transparent digital signal path is to send a known data pattern and to check whether it is received without bit errors. On Prism Sound analyzers, this test is called “Channel Check”. The receiving analyzer can keep a log file of failures over arbitrary time periods to verify the long-term reliability of the channel. The result should be zero errors.

For a non-transparent path, such as those including lossy codecs, A/D or D/A converters, different techniques must be used to detect intermittent faults. Here at Prism Sound we recommend transmitting high-quality sine waves and measuring distortion using a tight maximum reading limit. Breaches of this limit are automatically logged against time, and again, the required result is zero errors.

Digital source equipment can be monitored for digital carrier quality, with results again logged along with any breaches of limits. AES3 receivers can be tested by deliberately degrading the test system’s digital output carrier: By adjusting jitter, carrier amplitude, rise-time and interference we can test a receiver’s resilience to poor carrier signals. Prism Sound’s digital test instruments can even be left in-circuit in “loop-through” mode to assist in debugging troublesome systems ‘live’.
Conclusions
In today's digital broadcasting world, there is more equipment to test, and many more ways of testing it. Fortunately, the agile-minded engineer can develop ways to limit what needs to be done to the essentials, and expedite these procedures with highly integrated automated equipment. New techniques like multi-tone testing can vastly reduce testing time and new test problems arising from the adoption of new technology can be addressed with specialist equipment.


Tags: audio | iss039 | test equipment | aes | prismsound | multi-tone testing | jitter | bit activity | N/A
Contributing Author N/A

Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • Glensound show Beatrice the AES67 Network audio intercom beltpack at IBC 2018

    Glensound show Beatrice the AES67 Network audio intercom beltpack at IBC 2018

  • Latest audio product updates from TSL Products at IBC 2018

    Latest audio product updates from TSL Products at IBC 2018

  • Nugen Audio Loudness Meter, Halo Upmix and Halo Downmix at NAB 2018

    Nugen Audio Loudness Meter, Halo Upmix and Halo Downmix at NAB 2018

  • 7.1.2 Dolby Atmos support by Halo from Nugen Audio at NAB 2017

    7.1.2 Dolby Atmos support by Halo from Nugen Audio at NAB 2017

  • Nugen Audio at IBC 2016

    Nugen Audio at IBC 2016

  • AudioVideo BrandBuilder Corp at NAB 2016

    AudioVideo BrandBuilder Corp at NAB 2016

  • Nugen Audio at NAB 2016

    Nugen Audio at NAB 2016

  • Minnetonka Audio at NAB 2016

    Minnetonka Audio at NAB 2016

  • Nugen Audio Loudness Toolkit at BVE 2016

    Nugen Audio Loudness Toolkit at BVE 2016

  • Nugen Audio Halo Upmix at BVE 2016

    Nugen Audio Halo Upmix at BVE 2016

  • NUGEN Audio at IBC 2015

    NUGEN Audio at IBC 2015

  • NOA Audio Solutions at IBC 2015

    NOA Audio Solutions at IBC 2015

  • NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

    NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

  • Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

    Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

  • Audio Network on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Audio Network on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • NOA Audio Solutions at IBC 2013

    NOA Audio Solutions at IBC 2013

  • NuGen Audio at IBC 2013

    NuGen Audio at IBC 2013

  • NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

    NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

  • Nugen Audio at IBC 2012

    Nugen Audio at IBC 2012

  • Audio Developments at ProVideo2011

    Audio Developments at ProVideo2011

  • Audio Developments at BVE North 2011

    Audio Developments at BVE North 2011

  • Junger Audio at IBC2011

    Junger Audio at IBC2011

  • Telos Alliance at BVE 2017

    Telos Alliance at BVE 2017

  • Clear-Com Eclipse MADI Card at NAB 2012

    Clear-Com Eclipse MADI Card at NAB 2012

  • 4HM at BVE 2012

    4HM at BVE 2012

  • 4HM at BVE North 2011

    4HM at BVE North 2011

  • Nugen Halo Upmix and AMB Updates at IBC 2017

    Nugen Halo Upmix and AMB Updates at IBC 2017

  • Canford at BVE 2017

    Canford at BVE 2017

  • The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

    The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

  • Glensound at IBC 2016

    Glensound at IBC 2016

  • Studer Glacier at IBC 2016

    Studer Glacier at IBC 2016

  • Wohler at IBC 2016

    Wohler at IBC 2016

  • Video Devices PIX-E at IBC 2016

    Video Devices PIX-E at IBC 2016

  • Sound Devices Wingman app at IBC 2016

    Sound Devices Wingman app at IBC 2016

  • Sound Devices 688 at IBC 2015

    Sound Devices 688 at IBC 2015

  • Video Devices PIX-E Series at IBC 2015

    Video Devices PIX-E Series at IBC 2015

  • RTS at BVE 2015

    RTS at BVE 2015

  • Glensound Dante at IBC 2014

    Glensound Dante at IBC 2014

  • NOA Archive Solutions at IBC 2014

    NOA Archive Solutions at IBC 2014

  • RTW at IBC 2014

    RTW at IBC 2014

  • RTW at NAB 2014

    RTW at NAB 2014

  • Sound Devices at NAB 2014

    Sound Devices at NAB 2014

  • Studio Technologies at NAB 2014

    Studio Technologies at NAB 2014

  • Clear-Com ProGrid at NAB 2014

    Clear-Com ProGrid at NAB 2014

  • Clear-Com HelixNet Partyline at NAB 2014

    Clear-Com HelixNet Partyline at NAB 2014

  • Glensound Atomic Copper at NAB 2014

    Glensound Atomic Copper at NAB 2014

  • TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

    TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

  • Glensound Cub at BVE 2014

    Glensound Cub at BVE 2014

  • Calrec on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Calrec on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Wohler Technologies on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Wohler Technologies on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Nexidia QC on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Nexidia QC on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • TSL Products PAM1, SAM1 and PAM PiCo at IBC 2013

    TSL Products PAM1, SAM1 and PAM PiCo at IBC 2013

  • Glensound with the USB Commentary Mixer at IBC 2013

    Glensound with the USB Commentary Mixer at IBC 2013

  • TSL Products at IBC 2013

    TSL Products at IBC 2013

  • Calrec at NAB 2013

    Calrec at NAB 2013

  • Sound Devices at NAB 2013

    Sound Devices at NAB 2013

  • TSL Products at NAB 2013

    TSL Products at NAB 2013

  • Thear Technology at BVE 2013

    Thear Technology at BVE 2013

  • TSL Systems at BVE 2013

    TSL Systems at BVE 2013

  • TSL Products at BVE 2013

    TSL Products at BVE 2013

  • AC Entertainment Technologies at BVE 2013

    AC Entertainment Technologies at BVE 2013

  • Pinknoise at BVE North 2012

    Pinknoise at BVE North 2012

  • Shure Distribution at BVE North 2012 LIVE Show

    Shure Distribution at BVE North 2012 LIVE Show

  • RTW at NAB 2012

    RTW at NAB 2012

  • Sonifex at NAB 2012

    Sonifex at NAB 2012

  • Sound Devices at NAB 2012

    Sound Devices at NAB 2012

  • Emotion Systems at NAB 2012

    Emotion Systems at NAB 2012

  • Glensound at NAB 2012

    Glensound at NAB 2012

  • TSL at NAB 2012

    TSL at NAB 2012

  • Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

    Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

  • Petrol at NAB 2012

    Petrol at NAB 2012

  • Qualis at NAB 2012

    Qualis at NAB 2012

  • Calrec at NAB 2012

    Calrec at NAB 2012

  • DK-Technologies at NAB 2012

    DK-Technologies at NAB 2012

  • Glensound at BVE 2012

    Glensound at BVE 2012

  • Calrec at BVE 2012

    Calrec at BVE 2012

  • Sonifex at BVE 2012

    Sonifex at BVE 2012

  • DiGiCo at BVE 2012

    DiGiCo at BVE 2012

  • Thear Technology Limited at ProVideo2011

    Thear Technology Limited at ProVideo2011

  • TNP and DSMB at BVE North 2011

    TNP and DSMB at BVE North 2011

  • The Mic Store at BVE North 2011

    The Mic Store at BVE North 2011

  • Sennheiser at BVE North 2011

    Sennheiser at BVE North 2011

  • Source Distribution and Genelec at BVE North 2011

    Source Distribution and Genelec at BVE North 2011

  • HHB and Soundfield at BVE North 2011

    HHB and Soundfield at BVE North 2011

  • Riedel at BVE North 2011

    Riedel at BVE North 2011

  • Solid State Logic at IBC2011

    Solid State Logic at IBC2011

  • Dolby at IBC2011

    Dolby at IBC2011

  • Murraypro at IBC2011

    Murraypro at IBC2011

  • Calrec at IBC2011

    Calrec at IBC2011

  • TC Electronic at IBC2011

    TC Electronic at IBC2011

  • SADiE at IBC2011

    SADiE at IBC2011

  • RTW at IBC2011

    RTW at IBC2011

  • Prodys at IBC2011

    Prodys at IBC2011

  • DK Technology at IBC2011

    DK Technology at IBC2011

  • Linear Acoustic at IBC2011

    Linear Acoustic at IBC2011

  • Sound Devices at IBC2011

    Sound Devices at IBC2011

  • Tektronix at IBC 2013

    Tektronix at IBC 2013

  • Intercom over AES67 with V-Series IRIS from Clear-Com at IBC 2018

    Intercom over AES67 with V-Series IRIS from Clear-Com at IBC 2018

  • PARADISO Lite commentary unit from Glensound at BVE 2018

    PARADISO Lite commentary unit from Glensound at BVE 2018

  • Live Sports Broadcast Commentator from Glensound at NAB 2017

    Live Sports Broadcast Commentator from Glensound at NAB 2017


Related Shows
  • The future of audio with BBC R&D at BVE

    The future of audio with BBC R&D at BVE


Articles
Sony HDC-4800 Review
Andy McKenzie First announced at NAB 2016, the Sony HDC-4800 is a studio camera system capable of shooting 4K/UHD at up to 8x or full HD at up to 16x. With a price point upwards of £250,000 it is a very high-end product with a wide feature set. In Sony's own words, "This is the future of live production, designed to satisfy the storytelling aspect of modern sports production.” Deliveries began in mid 2017 and, after careful preliminary evaluation, we invested in several systems for our hire fleet ahead of the FIFA World Cup in Russia.
Tags: iss134 | review | hdc-4800 | sony | finepoint | Andy McKenzie
Contributing Author Andy McKenzie Click to read or download PDF
Accelerated Workflows with eGPU
Mike Griggs From the UK’s National Trust to magazine publishers to manufacturers, digital content creator Mike Griggs has a wide and varied portfolio of clients for whom he creates 3D art, motion graphics and multimedia exhibits. A typical day might involve sampling birdsong near Virginia Woolf’s country estate or creating 3D animations for VR. To keep on top of these demands, Griggs wanted to take the full power of the GPU computing revolution on the road.
Tags: iss134 | sonnet | egpu | amd | post production | editing | Mike Griggs
Contributing Author Mike Griggs Click to read or download PDF
The brave new world of software based production
Boromy Ung In today’s rapidly evolving broadcast industry, the only constant media organizations can truly count on is change — and the need to adapt as rapidly and cost-effectively as possible. One of the biggest agents of change is the IP revolution, driving broadcasters to migrate their operations to all-software solutions running on commodity, IT-based technologies.
Tags: iss134 | chyronhego | graphics | sports | ott | Boromy Ung
Contributing Author Boromy Ung Click to read or download PDF
What content providers need to know about OTT
Hiren Hindocha As OTT (Over-The-Top) technology has gotten more mature and established robust standards over the years, the concept of OTT monitoring is gaining popularity. With customer expectations soaring, it’s vital for OTT providers to deliver superior quality content. To deliver Quality of Experience (QoE) on par with linear TV broadcast, the entire system, starting from ingest to multi-bitrate encoding to delivery to CDN must be monitored continuously.
Tags: iss134 | ott monitoring | qos | logging | compliance | dash | atsc | cloud | Hiren Hindocha
Contributing Author Hiren Hindocha Click to read or download PDF
State of the Nation - November 2018
Dick Hobbs - new There is an interesting seminar called Size Matters at the KitPlus Show – organised by the publishers of this fine magazine – at MediaCityUK in Salford on 6 November. It’s a talk by cinematographer Alistair Chapman on the way that camera technology is changing, and in particular the size of the electronic device which creates the image is growing.
Tags: iss134 | cmos | 35mm | AJA | Arri | Blackmagic | Canon | Datavideo | GoPro | Grass Valley | Hitachi | Ikegami | JVC | Kinefinity | Nikon | Panasonic | Red | Sony | jpeg2000 | Dick Hobbs - new
Contributing Author Dick Hobbs - new Click to read or download PDF