Monitoring in the file-based environment


One of the major challenges facing broadcasters and content producers today is quality control. In the traditional model QC was performed by skilled viewers in real time, watching the content on a good monitor alongside a waveform monitor and audio meters to ensure the technical parameters were optimised.
That is still critical, although the onus for this is being moved from the distributor to the creator. The challenge comes from the need to deliver the content on multiple platforms, each potentially calling for different resolutions and codecs. Add the need to serve multiple territories – Discovery Channel in London routinely has 23 different audio tracks with different language versions for the same video – and the number of versions grows exponentially. Checking each in real time is simply impossible.
The solution is to monitor by exception. Each sub-system is carefully calibrated so that transcodings should remain within specifications, although there are circumstances in which illegal levels could be created: dynamic graphics added to different outputs, for example.
Automated QC systems can check at least some of the different outputs. These should perhaps better be called “assisted QC systems” as they have the potential to generate huge numbers of error messages. They need intelligent processing to mimic the applied common sense that would formerly have been applied by a human operator.
The real key for success, though, is making the asset management system aware of QC, and ensuring that it monitors it throughout the workflow. Quality metrics and statuses in the file-based domain are critical metadata elements, and need to be tracked.
On ingest the original metadata must be validated. Subsequent processes, such as transfers and transcodings, need to be planned into workflows which are controlled by the asset management, and the status of those processes monitored. As well as automating workflows this gives you an audit trail of what has happened to the content, which as well as assisting should problems need to be investigated becomes an important tool in considering the configuration of the system and planning future developments.
The system should be monitoring, tracking and recording the status of each element in the workflow. Where there are offline processes – content handed over to a Telestream transcoding farm, for example, or set for transfer to an archive – the efficiency of the queue handling is important information. If there are delays in the system this information will identify the bottlenecks and clearly indicate if further investment in hardware will ease the problem.
This is just one way in which test and measurement in the file-based era is moving into the business domain. The opportunity is there to track much more than audio and video levels, to the way in which each part of the workflow performs, and ultimately to the audience response to quality issues.
Inevitably, the technical parameters, such as bitrate, will be set differently for different channels and on different platforms: this is standard practice today. Is this reflected in consumer response? Do audiences reject some channels because they are perceived to have lower image quality? Do any technical errors which slip through the QC process cause audience disapproval?
By completing a comprehensive audit trail in the asset management system it becomes practical to plot technical issues against consumer response. That data allows channel managers to determine if they are losing revenue because of quality issues. Ultimately, they can put a value on technical quality, determining when further investment – in more or better equipment, or in more bandwidth on the delivery platforms – can be commercially justified.
Consumers do value quality. The popularity of large flat-screen televisions has driven the desire for good HD, and that appreciation of good technical quality has spread into everything we watch and hear. The technology to monitor and maintain quality in file-based environments exists, and needs only the change of mindset to become a real business advantage for the broadcaster or the network operator.

Tags: tmd | iss059 | transcoding | monitoring | qc | N/A
Contributing Author N/A

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • TMD Mediaflex-UMS at IBC 2017

    TMD Mediaflex-UMS at IBC 2017

  • TMD Corprate Update from IBC 2017

    TMD Corprate Update from IBC 2017

  • Mediaflex UMS Platform from TMD at NAB 2017

    Mediaflex UMS Platform from TMD at NAB 2017

  • New CEO and news update from TMD at NAB 2017

    New CEO and news update from TMD at NAB 2017

  • TMD at IBC 2016

    TMD at IBC 2016

  • TMD Mediaflex-UMS at IBC 2016

    TMD Mediaflex-UMS at IBC 2016

  • TMD at NAB 2016

    TMD at NAB 2016

  • TMD Mediaflex at NAB 2016

    TMD Mediaflex at NAB 2016

  • TMD at BVE 2016

    TMD at BVE 2016

  • TMD news update at IBC 2015

    TMD news update at IBC 2015

  • TMD Mediaflex at IBC 2015

    TMD Mediaflex at IBC 2015

  • TMD Chameleon at NAB 2015

    TMD Chameleon at NAB 2015

  • TMD Mediaflex at NAB 2015

    TMD Mediaflex at NAB 2015

  • TMD at BVE 2015

    TMD at BVE 2015

  • TMD summarises their work this year at IBC 2014

    TMD summarises their work this year at IBC 2014

  • TMD Mediaflex at IBC 2014

    TMD Mediaflex at IBC 2014

  • TMD at IBC 2014

    TMD at IBC 2014

  • TMD talk workflow on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    TMD talk workflow on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • TMD talk asset management solutions on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    TMD talk asset management solutions on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Tony Taylor from TMD talks about LTFS at IBC 2013

    Tony Taylor from TMD talks about LTFS at IBC 2013

  • Tony Taylor from TMD talks about Mediaflex CI

    Tony Taylor from TMD talks about Mediaflex CI

  • Tony Taylor from TMD talks about Post Production

    Tony Taylor from TMD talks about Post Production

  • TMD at NAB 2013: MediaFlex Reporting Module

    TMD at NAB 2013: MediaFlex Reporting Module

  • TMD at NAB 2013: MediaFlex Systems

    TMD at NAB 2013: MediaFlex Systems

  • TMD at NAB 2013: Content Intelligence

    TMD at NAB 2013: Content Intelligence

  • TMD at IBC 2012

    TMD at IBC 2012

  • TMD at NAB 2012

    TMD at NAB 2012

  • TMD at BVE 2012

    TMD at BVE 2012

  • TMD at IBC2011

    TMD at IBC2011

  • Prime Focus Technologies at IBC 2016

    Prime Focus Technologies at IBC 2016

  • Dalet at IBC 2014

    Dalet at IBC 2014

  • Telestream Wirecast and Switch at IBC 2014

    Telestream Wirecast and Switch at IBC 2014

  • Telestream Vantage support for DPP at IBC 2014

    Telestream Vantage support for DPP at IBC 2014

  • Telestream Enterprise at NAB 2014

    Telestream Enterprise at NAB 2014

  • Telestream Switch at NAB 2014

    Telestream Switch at NAB 2014

  • Telestream with Wirecast version five at IBC 2013

    Telestream with Wirecast version five at IBC 2013

  • Telestream with Post Producer at IBC 2013

    Telestream with Post Producer at IBC 2013

  • Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

    Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

  • Telestream at BVE 2013

    Telestream at BVE 2013

  • Haivision at NAB 2012

    Haivision at NAB 2012

  • Telestream at NAB 2012

    Telestream at NAB 2012

  • Elemental Technologies at IBC2011

    Elemental Technologies at IBC2011

  • Digital Rapids at IBC2011

    Digital Rapids at IBC2011

  • JVC monitoring solutions DT-G, DT-E, DT-U, and DT-V range at BVE 2018

    JVC monitoring solutions DT-G, DT-E, DT-U, and DT-V range at BVE 2018

  • IP, 3G-SDI + HDR generation, analysis and monitoring from Phabrix NAB 2017

    IP, 3G-SDI + HDR generation, analysis and monitoring from Phabrix NAB 2017

  • Apantac monitoring over IP at NAB 2016

    Apantac monitoring over IP at NAB 2016

  • Wohler MPEG Monitoring Series at IBC 2014

    Wohler MPEG Monitoring Series at IBC 2014

  • Wohler MPEG Monitoring at BVE 2014

    Wohler MPEG Monitoring at BVE 2014

  • Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

    Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

  • The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

    The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

  • Wohler at IBC 2016

    Wohler at IBC 2016

  • Phabrix Qx at IBC 2015

    Phabrix Qx at IBC 2015

  • Phabrix TAG and Rx at IBC 2015

    Phabrix TAG and Rx at IBC 2015

  • NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

    NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

  • Phabrix RX series at IBC 2014

    Phabrix RX series at IBC 2014

  • Volicon Products at IBC 2014

    Volicon Products at IBC 2014

  • Volicon at IBC 2014

    Volicon at IBC 2014

  • Wohler DPP at BVE 2014

    Wohler DPP at BVE 2014

  • Wohler Technologies on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Wohler Technologies on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Volicon on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Volicon on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Calrec Callisto at IBC 2013

    Calrec Callisto at IBC 2013

  • Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

    Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

  • Sound Devices at NAB 2013

    Sound Devices at NAB 2013

  • TSL Products at NAB 2013

    TSL Products at NAB 2013

  • TSL Systems at BVE 2013

    TSL Systems at BVE 2013

  • TSL Products at BVE 2013

    TSL Products at BVE 2013

  • Oxygen DCT at BVE North 2012

    Oxygen DCT at BVE North 2012

  • RTW at NAB 2012

    RTW at NAB 2012

  • TSL at NAB 2012

    TSL at NAB 2012

  • Qualis at NAB 2012

    Qualis at NAB 2012

  • Digital Nirvana at NAB 2012

    Digital Nirvana at NAB 2012

  • Leader at IBC2011

    Leader at IBC2011

  • Murraypro at IBC2011

    Murraypro at IBC2011

  • DK Technology at IBC2011

    DK Technology at IBC2011

  • Nexidia QC on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Nexidia QC on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Root6 at NAB 2012

    Root6 at NAB 2012

  • PlayBox Technology at BVE North 2011

    PlayBox Technology at BVE North 2011


Related Shows
  • Sony monitoring at BVE with Den Lennie

    Sony monitoring at BVE with Den Lennie


Articles
Test, Measurement and Standards
Alan Wheable The Alliance for IP Media Solutions (AIMS), is a non-profit trade alliance that fosters the adoption of one set of common, ubiquitous, standards-based protocols for interoperability over IP in the media and entertainment, and professional audio/video industries.
Tags: iss135 | omnitek | aims | SNMP | hdr | ai | Alan Wheable
Contributing Author Alan Wheable Click to read or download PDF
The making of The Heist
Tom Hutchings Shine TV has never been one to shy away from a challenge, be that in terms of using new technologies, filming ideas or overall formats: we pride ourselves on being ambitious and risk-takers.
Tags: iss135 | liveu | heist | streaming | cellular | mobile | connectivity | Tom Hutchings
Contributing Author Tom Hutchings Click to read or download PDF
Your two week editing future
Alex Macleod

So here we are - January again! Usually a good time to reflect on the year just gone by, and a good time to look forward to the coming months as the new year begins.

When I was reflecting on my 2018, and when thinking about what to write for my first article for Kit Plus - I kept coming back to one theme - organisation.

Tags: iss135 | editing | mediacity training | premiere pro | dit | Alex Macleod
Contributing Author Alex Macleod Click to read or download PDF
21st Century Technology for 20th Century Content
James Hall A big challenge facing owners of legacy content is rationalising and archiving their tape and film-based media in cost effective and efficient ways, whilst also adding value. Normally the result of this is to find a low cost means of digitising the content – usually leaving them with a bunch of assets on HDD. But then what? How can content owners have their cake and eat it?
Tags: iss135 | legacy | digitising | digitizing | archive | James Hall
Contributing Author James Hall Click to read or download PDF
Future proofing post production storage
Josh Goldenhar Advancements in NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express), the storage protocol designed for flash, are revolutionising data storage. According to G2M Research, the NVMe market will grow to $60 billion by 2021, with 70 percent of all-flash arrays being based on the protocol by 2020. NVMe, acting like steroids for flash-based storage infrastructures, dynamically and dramatically accelerates data delivery.
Tags: iss135 | nvme | sas | sata | it | storage | post production | Josh Goldenhar
Contributing Author Josh Goldenhar Click to read or download PDF