Proprietary vs. off the shelf hardware for OTT video delivery


Nivedita Nouval TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
by Nivedita Nouval
Issue 90 - June 2014

What are the main equipment at stake in an OTT video delivery system?

An OTT video delivery system consists of an array of video servers that are able to store and stream content according to different formats defined by standards (e.g., HLS, HSS, HDS, and MPEG-DASH).

Traditionally, there is an origin server, located in the head-end, which references all of the VOD content and ingests the live TV channels. It features a massive amount of storage and has limited streaming capabilities.

Several edge servers are located closer to the end-users. They have a smaller storage capability but a much greater streaming performance.

A management system allocates the streaming requests to the right server, and allows operators to monitor the complete system.

Finally, an analytics server is generally used to gather information about the usage patterns of the system.

What are the benefits of using off-the-shelf hardware for these equipment?


There are numerous advantages to relying on off-the-shelf hardware for OTT video delivery. Because hardware vendors like IBM-Lenovo, HP or Dell are devoting continuous efforts to improve the performances of their appliances and to reducing their energy consumption, a technology provider who relies on these platforms can take advantage of these improvements at no cost and therefore focus their resources on the development of their own software.

Flexibility is another key benefit. Using off-the-shelf hardware, the purpose of hardware can be changed easily. For example, an encoder can be transformed into a streaming server or a streaming server into an analytics server, with the possibility of mixing the software vendors.

In addition, upgrades are easy. Generally, all thats required is a simple software reinstall as opposed to a costly hardware swap. This aspect of software empowers the service provider sourcing department by reducing the adherence to a specific CDN technology vendor.

Separating hardware and software also brings business flexibility, offering the possibility to dissociate the provisioning of the hardware and the delivery of the CDN software leading to faster system deployments.

Maintenance is made easier, as big providers are likely to have spare parts and dedicated local representatives for support.

In addition, a pure software approach allows specific workflow optimizations to extend the lifetime of the components, greatly reducing their wearing.

Eventually, the possibility of virtualizing a part or the totality of the system is only possible when a pure software approach has been adopted.

What does virtualization bring in the OTT video delivery field?

Deploying a CDN solution in a private cloud (i.e., a datacenter where an operator can provision blade centers, storage, processing power, and connectivity) has many benefits for operators.

The biggest benefit is costs savings in terms of hardware, of course, since resource sharing with other functions is possible. These functions can be related to content delivery (e.g., load balancing between different servers handling different formats, or between packagers and streamers) but can also extend to completely unrelated processes such as payroll or invoicing. In terms of energy and staff, it is much more efficient to manage a single IT infrastructure.

Another advantage is seamless growth management. Adding more storage or additional processing power can be achieved in just a few clicks. In comparison, sourcing dedicated hardware can take weeks.

System robustness is another benefit. Disaster recovery is a feature that comes naturally with the notion of cloud, with built-in capabilities for duplicating content. In case a virtual server fails, the sessions can be handled by another one.

Utilizing a private cloud-based CDN solution, operators can adopt a hybrid approach to OTT video delivery to where some components, like the management system and the analytics, as well as the On-Net streaming servers are kept in-house to maximize security and control while the streaming servers for off-net delivery are deployed outside the organization in the public cloud, closer to end-users for optimal performance.

In addition, virtualization platforms provide advanced monitoring tools that enable operators to natively supervise all the modules of the system.

Given the wide range of benefits offered by an off-the-shelf hardware and software approach compared with a proprietary hardware method, it is the superior solution for global OTT video delivery.


Tags: iss090 | Broadpeak | OTT | Nivedita Nouval
Contributing Author Nivedita Nouval

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • Broadpeak shows nanoCDN multicast ABR at IBC 2018

    Broadpeak shows nanoCDN multicast ABR at IBC 2018

  • Broadpeak Technology nano CDN technology multicast ABR

    Broadpeak Technology nano CDN technology multicast ABR

  • Broadpeak at IBC 2016

    Broadpeak at IBC 2016

  • Broadpeak at IBC 2013

    Broadpeak at IBC 2013

  • Broadpeak at IBC 2012

    Broadpeak at IBC 2012

  • Broadpeak at NAB 2012

    Broadpeak at NAB 2012

  • Safer OTT and TV Platforms from Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2017

    Safer OTT and TV Platforms from Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2017

  • Smarter OTT and TV Platforms from Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2017

    Smarter OTT and TV Platforms from Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2017

  • Scott Hill uses EditShare: Lightworks at NAB 2013

    Scott Hill uses EditShare: Lightworks at NAB 2013

  • The Virtual Production Bottleneck – How can we sustain growth during a talent drought?

    The Virtual Production Bottleneck – How can we sustain growth during a talent drought?

  • YouTube and the myths, the business and the opportunities

    YouTube and the myths, the business and the opportunities

  • Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2016

    Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2016

  • Prime Focus Technologies at IBC 2016

    Prime Focus Technologies at IBC 2016

  • Kino Flo at NAB 2016

    Kino Flo at NAB 2016

  • Comigo at IBC 2015

    Comigo at IBC 2015

  • EBS at IBC 2015

    EBS at IBC 2015

  • Volicon at IBC 2015

    Volicon at IBC 2015

  • Thomson Video Networks at IBC 2014

    Thomson Video Networks at IBC 2014

  • BBright at IBC 2014

    BBright at IBC 2014

  • Visual Unity at IBC 2014

    Visual Unity at IBC 2014

  • Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2014

    Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2014

  • SIS LIVE ManPak and LoStow at IBC 2014

    SIS LIVE ManPak and LoStow at IBC 2014

  • Perception at NAB 2014

    Perception at NAB 2014

  • Visual Unity at NAB 2014

    Visual Unity at NAB 2014

  • ATEME at NAB 2014

    ATEME at NAB 2014

  • TMD talk asset management solutions on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    TMD talk asset management solutions on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Cambridge Imaging Systems on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Cambridge Imaging Systems on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

    Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

  • Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

    Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

  • Vimond Control Center at NAB 2013

    Vimond Control Center at NAB 2013

  • Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

    Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

  • Tariam Tooway stand at BVE 2013

    Tariam Tooway stand at BVE 2013


Related Shows
  • What you need to know about media compliance, logging and analysis

    What you need to know about media compliance, logging and analysis


Articles
Avid and Rohde & Schwarz
Ciaran Doran

Rohde & Schwarz is the perfect ingest partner to build flexible workflows with Avid.

Tags: Rohde and Schwarz | avid | spycernode | editing | asset management | venice | Ciaran Doran
Contributing Author Ciaran Doran Click to read
Sennheiser MKE 400 hands on review and test
KitPlus

Sennheiser have just released two products aimed at simplifying audio on the move, the MKE400 shotgun microphone and the XS Lav Mic, in this review we’re looking at the MKE400.

Tags: sennheiser mke400 | sennheiser mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 quality | best microphones for youtube | mic for youtube videos | sennheiser mke 400 hands on | microphone review | iphone videography | microphones | sound for video | camera microphone | microphone for iphone | microphone for youtube | video microphone | shotgun mics | smartphone microphone | vlogging mic | best microphone for video | shotgun microphone review | mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 hands on review | sennheiser mke 400 test | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read
A Broadcasters Guide to Microservices
Roger Persson

The word “microservices” has been creeping into the conversation about software-centric systems recently. Is it really a different approach, what does it mean, and what are the advantages?

Tags: nxt edition | microservices | modular software | Roger Persson
Contributing Author Roger Persson Click to read
Streaming Technologies Explained
Bruce Devlin - new

The word streaming can relate to different technologies from different manufacturers in different scenarios and in this short article we are going to take a little tour of what it all means. 

Tags: mr mxf | streaming | hls | dash | cmaf | mpeg | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new Click to read
REVIEW - Hollyland MARS 400S PRO Digital Wireless Transmission System
Phil Vinter

Built by Hollyland and costing around £600 the Mars 400S is an easy-to-use wireless video transmitter/receiver system – it will be right up the alley of anyone who, like me, considers an instruction manual to be nothing more than box padding.

Read Phils Full review here, and link to the video review.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | MARS 400 | wireless | tx | rx | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read