Why Renting is the New Buying


Ed Tischler TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
Download PDF
Download PDF

To rent or to buy? This has long been a topic of debate in the world of property, with people having to choose between spending virtually all of their money up front or giving their money away each month with little chance of seeing a return.

How does this apply to the media and entertainment sector? Well, the need to constantly evolve to stay ahead of the technology curve places a heavy emphasis on embracing innovation. It has never been more important for businesses to adopt new ways of working and new technologies. However, factors such as shrinking budgets and limited periods of utilisation mean many organisations are being hindered by the associated capital expenditure involved.

This means the traditional tactic of purchasing their own assets such as cameras, lenses and live production tools, and then sweating them as much as possible in order to extract maximum value is no longer viable for many media organisations. For several reasons, it has become an outdated approach.

Challenges to consider

The most important thing for organisations to remember is they have to get the procurement process right. There’s no room for error, which is becoming more of a challenge as solutions get more advanced and complex and standards continue to be developed. From getting locked in to a certain vendor, to picking one that doesn’t align to its technical roadmap, making the wrong decision could hinder an organisation for years. As such, having access to a diverse portfolio of assets and hardware may actually be a better fit within their workflow.

The second issue is that expensive pieces of kit now become outdated faster than ever before. Advances in technology move faster than buying cycles, meaning it doesn’t take long for users to fall behind. With manufacturers primarily interested in selling in their latest and greatest offerings, users can quickly find themselves without access to new and important features. The pressure is on to keep up.

Thirdly, maintaining this equipment can be a drain on resources, particularly having to cope with any downtime while kit is being serviced or repaired. If the kit isn’t physically functioning, businesses are losing money.

Finally, there is the matter of cost. While buying the latest technology can help drive growth by bringing in new business from end users looking to work with the latest formats and workflows, it can also be extremely expensive. This often puts new technology beyond the reach of many budgets.

Reasons to rent

With all these factors in mind, it’s no surprise that long-term hiring of equipment is becoming increasingly attractive to those involved in the content creation process. In the same way that users can always get the latest handsets through phone upgrade programmes, or lease cars for a certain period of time through personal contract purchases, renting helps organisations flex towards the latest technology and work within a broadcast space that ordinarily would be cost prohibitive.

And there are plenty of other benefits. For example, specialist rental companies handle most of the evaluation work, as it’s in their best interest to do their homework and invest in what they believe to be the top performing solutions (i.e. the ones that are likely to deliver the best returns). If these companies have good relationships with the manufacturers, then they’ll also probably be among the first to access new models and alternative solutions when they are released. Rental agreements can simply be updated, letting end users get their hands on top-of-the-range technologies sooner so their creative toolkits remain at the cutting edge.

A TV studio provides a good example of how this works in practice. The studio faces competition from rival facilities for work, so being able to offer the latest production infrastructure is highly advantageous. With the likes of Netflix and other OTT services continuing to grow, the demand for progressive video formats such as 4K and 1080p are ever-increasing. Even if a production is being delivered in HD, there are business and quality advantages to be had in capturing it in UHD, but investing in the necessary cameras and lenses can be hard to justify for many businesses. This is especially true if the existing HD units are still performing as they should. But it doesn’t just come down to cost. In today’s environment, any studio that only offers an HD service risks losing projects, falling behind the technology curve and failing to meet the aspirations of producers who want a higher quality. This is an increasing occurrence and a trend that will continue as the consumption of content further evolves.

And what happens when this kit needs maintaining? It’s got to go back to the workshop or manufacturer, likely taking it out of action for days or even weeks until it’s ready to be returned.

If there’s no spare, this could even result in productions being turned away or increased overheads potentially harming future bookings or revenue for the studio.

Time to think long-term

By renting equipment, the onus is on the hire company to quickly source a replacement and provide a fix when something goes wrong. This ensures minimal disruption and fosters long-term customer loyalty by giving them confidence that there are unlikely to be any on-set technical issues to overcome, on top of being able to get their hands on the latest technologies. It’s an important factor to consider when sizing up rental partners. The larger the inventories of stock they carry, and the greater their geographical reach, the quicker they can respond to issues wherever or whenever they occur. The more innovative and forward looking the hardware, the greater the edge businesses can gain over their competitors.

The cost of rental also removes the issue of having to invest large amounts of capital in costly purchases, making it much more appealing to those involved in procurement.

While all of these exciting new tech buzzwords get banded around, many seem a long way off before they’re accessible. But renting can be an extremely effective way of getting around this issue. Content creators want to use the latest solutions to best showcase their work, and those that are unable to offer them will miss out. Modern businesses value flexibility over assets, so it’s essential that they put themselves in the best position to adapt as technology evolves. Renting instead of buying could be the key to staying relevant and getting an advantage over the competition.


Tags: iss142 | gravity media | ott | renting | Ed Tischler
Contributing Author Ed Tischler

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Download PDF
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • Safer OTT and TV Platforms from Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2017

    Safer OTT and TV Platforms from Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2017

  • Smarter OTT and TV Platforms from Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2017

    Smarter OTT and TV Platforms from Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2017

  • Scott Hill uses EditShare: Lightworks at NAB 2013

    Scott Hill uses EditShare: Lightworks at NAB 2013

  • The Virtual Production Bottleneck – How can we sustain growth during a talent drought?

    The Virtual Production Bottleneck – How can we sustain growth during a talent drought?

  • YouTube and the myths, the business and the opportunities

    YouTube and the myths, the business and the opportunities

  • Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2016

    Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2016

  • Prime Focus Technologies at IBC 2016

    Prime Focus Technologies at IBC 2016

  • Kino Flo at NAB 2016

    Kino Flo at NAB 2016

  • Comigo at IBC 2015

    Comigo at IBC 2015

  • EBS at IBC 2015

    EBS at IBC 2015

  • Volicon at IBC 2015

    Volicon at IBC 2015

  • Thomson Video Networks at IBC 2014

    Thomson Video Networks at IBC 2014

  • BBright at IBC 2014

    BBright at IBC 2014

  • Visual Unity at IBC 2014

    Visual Unity at IBC 2014

  • Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2014

    Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2014

  • SIS LIVE ManPak and LoStow at IBC 2014

    SIS LIVE ManPak and LoStow at IBC 2014

  • Perception at NAB 2014

    Perception at NAB 2014

  • Visual Unity at NAB 2014

    Visual Unity at NAB 2014

  • ATEME at NAB 2014

    ATEME at NAB 2014

  • TMD talk asset management solutions on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    TMD talk asset management solutions on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Cambridge Imaging Systems on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Cambridge Imaging Systems on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

    Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

  • Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

    Bridge Technologies PocketProbe App at NAB 2013

  • Vimond Control Center at NAB 2013

    Vimond Control Center at NAB 2013

  • Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

    Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

  • Tariam Tooway stand at BVE 2013

    Tariam Tooway stand at BVE 2013


Related Shows
  • What you need to know about media compliance, logging and analysis

    What you need to know about media compliance, logging and analysis


Articles
Sennheiser MKE 400 hands on review and test
KitPlus

Sennheiser have just released two products aimed at simplifying audio on the move, the MKE400 shotgun microphone and the XS Lav Mic, in this review we’re looking at the MKE400.

Tags: sennheiser mke400 | sennheiser mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 quality | best microphones for youtube | mic for youtube videos | sennheiser mke 400 hands on | microphone review | iphone videography | microphones | sound for video | camera microphone | microphone for iphone | microphone for youtube | video microphone | shotgun mics | smartphone microphone | vlogging mic | best microphone for video | shotgun microphone review | mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 hands on review | sennheiser mke 400 test | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read
A Broadcasters Guide to Microservices
Roger Persson

The word “microservices” has been creeping into the conversation about software-centric systems recently. Is it really a different approach, what does it mean, and what are the advantages?

Tags: nxt edition | microservices | modular software | Roger Persson
Contributing Author Roger Persson Click to read
Streaming Technologies Explained
Bruce Devlin - new

The word streaming can relate to different technologies from different manufacturers in different scenarios and in this short article we are going to take a little tour of what it all means. 

Tags: mr mxf | streaming | hls | dash | cmaf | mpeg | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new Click to read
REVIEW - Hollyland MARS 400S PRO Digital Wireless Transmission System
Phil Vinter

Built by Hollyland and costing around £600 the Mars 400S is an easy-to-use wireless video transmitter/receiver system – it will be right up the alley of anyone who, like me, considers an instruction manual to be nothing more than box padding.

Read Phils Full review here, and link to the video review.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | MARS 400 | wireless | tx | rx | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read
HOLLYLAND LARK 150 Review
Phil Vinter

The exponential growth of video supercharged a technological revolution that began in the early noughties with the advent of DSLR cameras.
The cinematic-style shallow depth of field image video quality from DSLRs was a revelation, but, back then audio was the big drawback. As demand has grown so the technology has improved and today’s one-man-band small rig set ups can capture pretty good sound into a DSLR style camera.

Phil Vinter reviews the latest release from HOLLYLAND and it's a thumbs up from us.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | radio mic | audio | LARK-150 | CVP | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read