Why you might regret automating QC workflows


Bruce Devlin TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
by Bruce Devlin
Issue 107 - November 2015

In todays electronic media environment, broadcasters and content owners live and die according to the quality and versatility of their media assets. Not only do consumers expect the best quality viewing experience, but they also expect that viewing experience to be possible on the widest range of devices, at any time and in any situation.

This might seem like a Herculean challenge, however the evolution of file-based workflows has provided the means for broadcasters and content owners to service this new multi-platform demand efficiently and profitably. Using one of the new generation Media Asset Management (MAM) platforms, it is possible to manage media output in the highest quality and across a broad diversity of viewing devices.

However, an absolutely critical factor in this process is the quality of your media assets. If the media file is not fit for purpose it can result in the consumers viewing experience falling short of expectations. Furthermore, a poor quality media file can become toxic within a workflow and can create issues and even major system failures if it is not identified, ring-fenced and fixed at the earliest possible stage.

Automated QC yes or no?

So, we all agree that media QC is a critical issue. The next question is how to achieve the optimum QC facilities without it becoming excessively costly and slowing down your workflow, thereby reducing overall efficiency. There is always a balance to be struck between process automation and manual intervention, and the task is getting that balance right.

The EBU are clear on this subject. The organization recognised QC as an important topic for the media industry in 2010. The following year it started an EBU Strategic Programme on Quality Control, with the aim to collect requirements, experiences and to create recommendations for broadcasters implementing file-based QC in their facilities.

Today, facilities are able to benefit from the findings on this Programme. Firstly, the EBU does not recommend entirely manual QC systems it says, Broadcasters moving to file-based production facilities have to consider how to use automated Quality Control systems. Manual quality control is simply not adequate anymore and it does not scale.

However, this does not mean that the optimum solution is fully automated QC regimes. I believe that broadcasters and facilities would quickly regret installing a fully automated QC system since there are certain media faults and scenarios that are not efficiently detected and corrected by machines. In certain scenarios it is far easier, more efficient and less costly to combine human intervention alongside the process automation engine. Furthermore, in some situations a trained operator can perform the required media file fix much more quickly and efficiently than any machine.

The challenge is to create a combined human and automated QC review system, which provides a single integrated user interface for media fix-up judgment. This will enable a range of different human interventions, including creative, forced and controlled operations.

The end result is a fast, efficient and flexible file-based workflow that mixes automated inspection and metadata generation with human judgment where media file quality is assured from the first touch to final delivery.


Tags: iss107 | dalet academy | qc workflows | automation | media assets | multi platform | device | Bruce Devlin
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • DALET ACADEMY NAB 2015

    DALET ACADEMY NAB 2015

  • Be More with Clear from Prime Focus Technologies at NAB 2017

    Be More with Clear from Prime Focus Technologies at NAB 2017

  • Facility Management Software from Xytech at NAB 2017

    Facility Management Software from Xytech at NAB 2017

  • ROOT6 Technology at IBC 2015

    ROOT6 Technology at IBC 2015

  • Telestream Enterprise at NAB 2014

    Telestream Enterprise at NAB 2014

  • Telestream Switch at NAB 2014

    Telestream Switch at NAB 2014

  • Miranda on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Miranda on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Softron Media Services on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Softron Media Services on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Telestream with Wirecast version five at IBC 2013

    Telestream with Wirecast version five at IBC 2013

  • Telestream with Post Producer at IBC 2013

    Telestream with Post Producer at IBC 2013

  • Cinegy: Multiviewer at NAB 2013

    Cinegy: Multiviewer at NAB 2013

  • Root6 at NAB 2012

    Root6 at NAB 2012

  • PlayBox Technology at IBC2011

    PlayBox Technology at IBC2011

  • Mosart at IBC2011

    Mosart at IBC2011

  • Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

    Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

  • Media Links Net Gazer and Next Gen Media Gateway Device at IBC 2017

    Media Links Net Gazer and Next Gen Media Gateway Device at IBC 2017

  • Video Devices PIX-E at IBC 2016

    Video Devices PIX-E at IBC 2016

  • Sound Devices Wingman app at IBC 2016

    Sound Devices Wingman app at IBC 2016

  • Video Devices at NAB 2016

    Video Devices at NAB 2016

  • Sound Devices 6-Series mixers at NAB 2016

    Sound Devices 6-Series mixers at NAB 2016

  • Video Devices at BVE 2016

    Video Devices at BVE 2016

  • Sound Devices 688 at IBC 2015

    Sound Devices 688 at IBC 2015

  • Video Devices PIX-E Series at IBC 2015

    Video Devices PIX-E Series at IBC 2015

  • Sound Devices at NAB 2014

    Sound Devices at NAB 2014

  • Sound Devices on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Sound Devices on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Sound Devices PIX260i Recorder at IBC 2013

    Sound Devices PIX260i Recorder at IBC 2013

  • Sound Devices at NAB 2013

    Sound Devices at NAB 2013

  • Shure Sound Devices at BVE 2013

    Shure Sound Devices at BVE 2013

  • Sound Devices at NAB 2012

    Sound Devices at NAB 2012

  • Sound Devices at ProVideo2011

    Sound Devices at ProVideo2011

  • Sound Devices at IBC2011

    Sound Devices at IBC2011

  • KitPlus filming rig used at BVE 2017

    KitPlus filming rig used at BVE 2017

  • Filming kit review from NAB

    Filming kit review from NAB

  • Clear-Com at IBC 2015

    Clear-Com at IBC 2015

  • Pronology at IBC 2014

    Pronology at IBC 2014

  • LiveU: Smart Grip at NAB 2013

    LiveU: Smart Grip at NAB 2013

  • Shure Distribution at BVE North 2012 Part 2

    Shure Distribution at BVE North 2012 Part 2


Related Shows
  • Day 4 of BroadcastShow at IBC

    Day 4 of BroadcastShow at IBC


Articles
Test, Measurement and Standards
Alan Wheable The Alliance for IP Media Solutions (AIMS), is a non-profit trade alliance that fosters the adoption of one set of common, ubiquitous, standards-based protocols for interoperability over IP in the media and entertainment, and professional audio/video industries.
Tags: iss135 | omnitek | aims | SNMP | hdr | ai | Alan Wheable
Contributing Author Alan Wheable Click to read or download PDF
Switching to Internet Based Distribution
Chris Clark

"An IP status check for the broadcast industry", "Resistance is futile", "IP points the way forward for the broadcast industry"...

Yes, we've read the headlines too. But rather than force you into submission, scare you, or leave you feeling like you have no other choice, we want to give you the information that helps you to make a sensible decision about Internet-based distribution.

So what’s stopping you from making the switch right now?

Tags: iss135 | ip | internet | distribution | cerberus | Chris Clark
Contributing Author Chris Clark Click to read or download PDF
21st Century Technology for 20th Century Content
James Hall A big challenge facing owners of legacy content is rationalising and archiving their tape and film-based media in cost effective and efficient ways, whilst also adding value. Normally the result of this is to find a low cost means of digitising the content – usually leaving them with a bunch of assets on HDD. But then what? How can content owners have their cake and eat it?
Tags: iss135 | legacy | digitising | digitizing | archive | James Hall
Contributing Author James Hall Click to read or download PDF
Your two week editing future
Alex Macleod

So here we are - January again! Usually a good time to reflect on the year just gone by, and a good time to look forward to the coming months as the new year begins.

When I was reflecting on my 2018, and when thinking about what to write for my first article for Kit Plus - I kept coming back to one theme - organisation.

Tags: iss135 | editing | mediacity training | premiere pro | dit | Alex Macleod
Contributing Author Alex Macleod Click to read or download PDF
The making of The Heist
Tom Hutchings Shine TV has never been one to shy away from a challenge, be that in terms of using new technologies, filming ideas or overall formats: we pride ourselves on being ambitious and risk-takers.
Tags: iss135 | liveu | heist | streaming | cellular | mobile | connectivity | Tom Hutchings
Contributing Author Tom Hutchings Click to read or download PDF