Audio loudness for video post


TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
For decades audiences have been complaining about the differences in perceived loudness between different parts of a television service, most commonly that the commercials seem louder than the programmes. Finally broadcasters, prompted in many cases by regulators, have addressed the issue. Over the last decade research has determined what it is that makes something sound loud – which is not the same as the measured audio level – and determined the parameters by which it can be measured.
These principles are enshrined in EBU recommended practice R 128, which is based on ITU recommendations BS1770. In America, the Calm legislation (the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act) follows the same principles. Many countries in Europe (although not as yet the UK) have legislated for audio loudness.
The problem is that, while the parameters are clearly defined in these various international standards, the absolute numbers are not. The inevitable has happened: specifications of what constitutes maximum loudness vary from country to country.
As with all other critical signal parameters, when you deliver a piece of work the first thing that the receiving broadcaster will do is run a QC check on it and, if it fails, bounce it back to you. So you need to be sure you do not exceed loudness norms, just as you need to ensure the picture is within colour gamut.
If you are an edit house, you may not have not worked on the audio, but received it from an external facility. So it is sensible to check it when it arrives and, if there is a problem, get your audio house to rework it while there is still time.
Even starting with a good track, it may get modified accidentally as it passes through the finishing process, so when you run out the final uncompressed master Quicktime it is appropriate to run another check. Finally, when you create the deliverables, in MPEG or MXF, from the master, you probably should check loudness in case something unexpected happened in the compression. If you are delivering to multiple territories this is the moment to check against local specifications.
Should one of these later checks reveal a loudness problem and there is no time for reworking, at least you can attenuate the whole soundtrack to pull it down to an acceptable level.
All of this suggests that it would be good if the loudness monitoring is automatic, rather than continually taking an engineer out to run it through audio meters. More important, though, is that the EBU defines three parameters for loudness: momentary (up to 400ms), short term (up to 3s) and long term (the length of the content). Watching three loudness meters and a level meter simultaneously is neither an easy nor rewarding task for a commercial, and impossible if you are mastering a drama series.
Emotion Systems talked to a number of people from audio and video post houses and broadcasters about this issue. One common view was that checking loudness should be a matter of pushing a button, and should result in a report with some detail as well as a simple pass or fail. Customers also pointed out that as they needed different profiles for different delivery regimes, it had to be easy to configure parameters.
With all these requirements in mind, we have produced a software product called 'eFF'. This application pulls in the content file in any of the common working or delivery formats. At the front end it might be a .wav file from an audio house; later it will be a video file. The software reads through the audio component, much faster than real time, and checks it against the loudness specifications.
Because of the need to accommodate different regimes, the software incorporates a profile structure. Should the broadcast authorities in, say, Austria change their loudness requirements within the R128 specification, that can be handled by simply downloading a replacement profile.
Operationally, the user simply selects the profiles to be checked against, and requests either a report or a report and fix. If the latter, for each profile the software attenuates the audio file if necessary, without affecting the video or metadata content of the file.
In either case a report is generated in XML and as a graph. These can be included with the content on delivery, to demonstrate to the broadcaster that the file was checked against the appropriate profile and, as the saying goes, it was all right leaving me.

Tags: iss061 | loudness | bs1770 | eby | r128 | itu | calm | N/A
Contributing Author N/A

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

    NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

  • Product Updates to SAM-Q including MADI & Loudness and PAM-IP updates from TSL Products at IBC 2019

    Product Updates to SAM-Q including MADI & Loudness and PAM-IP updates from TSL Products at IBC 2019

  • VisLM Loudness Meter update from Nugen Audio at IBC 2019

    VisLM Loudness Meter update from Nugen Audio at IBC 2019

  • Nugen Audio Loudness Meter, Halo Upmix and Halo Downmix at NAB 2018

    Nugen Audio Loudness Meter, Halo Upmix and Halo Downmix at NAB 2018

  • Nugen Audio Loudness Toolkit at BVE 2016

    Nugen Audio Loudness Toolkit at BVE 2016

  • NUGEN Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2015

    NUGEN Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2015

  • Junger Audio at IBC2011

    Junger Audio at IBC2011

  • Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

    Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

  • TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

    TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

  • Emotion Systems at NAB 2012

    Emotion Systems at NAB 2012

  • DK-Technologies at NAB 2012

    DK-Technologies at NAB 2012

  • The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

    The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

  • Wohler at IBC 2016

    Wohler at IBC 2016

  • NUGEN Audio at IBC 2015

    NUGEN Audio at IBC 2015

  • NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

    NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

  • RTW at IBC 2014

    RTW at IBC 2014

  • RTW at NAB 2014

    RTW at NAB 2014

  • Cobalt Digital at NAB 2014

    Cobalt Digital at NAB 2014

  • RTW at IBC 2013

    RTW at IBC 2013

  • NuGen Audio at IBC 2013

    NuGen Audio at IBC 2013

  • TSL Products at NAB 2013

    TSL Products at NAB 2013

  • TSL Systems at BVE 2013

    TSL Systems at BVE 2013

  • TSL Products at BVE 2013

    TSL Products at BVE 2013

  • RTW at NAB 2012

    RTW at NAB 2012

  • Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

    Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

  • Qualis at NAB 2012

    Qualis at NAB 2012

  • TSL at BVE 2012

    TSL at BVE 2012

  • Sonifex at BVE 2012

    Sonifex at BVE 2012

  • Emotion Systems at BVE 2012

    Emotion Systems at BVE 2012

  • HHB and TC Electronic at BVE North2011

    HHB and TC Electronic at BVE North2011

  • Volicon at IBC2011

    Volicon at IBC2011

  • TC Electronic at IBC2011

    TC Electronic at IBC2011

  • Cobalt Digital at IBC2011

    Cobalt Digital at IBC2011

  • RTW at IBC2011

    RTW at IBC2011

  • DK Technology at IBC2011

    DK Technology at IBC2011

  • Linear Acoustic at IBC2011

    Linear Acoustic at IBC2011

  • ProVideo2011

    ProVideo2011

  • IOV at ProVideo2011

    IOV at ProVideo2011

  • IAC at ProVideo2011

    IAC at ProVideo2011


Related Shows
  • Volicon replacements and ensuring compliance with Mediaproxy LogServer

    Volicon replacements and ensuring compliance with Mediaproxy LogServer


Articles
Avid and Rohde & Schwarz
Ciaran Doran

Rohde & Schwarz is the perfect ingest partner to build flexible workflows with Avid.

Tags: Rohde and Schwarz | avid | spycernode | editing | asset management | venice | Ciaran Doran
Contributing Author Ciaran Doran Click to read
Sennheiser MKE 400 hands on review and test
KitPlus

Sennheiser have just released two products aimed at simplifying audio on the move, the MKE400 shotgun microphone and the XS Lav Mic, in this review we’re looking at the MKE400.

Tags: sennheiser mke400 | sennheiser mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 quality | best microphones for youtube | mic for youtube videos | sennheiser mke 400 hands on | microphone review | iphone videography | microphones | sound for video | camera microphone | microphone for iphone | microphone for youtube | video microphone | shotgun mics | smartphone microphone | vlogging mic | best microphone for video | shotgun microphone review | mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 hands on review | sennheiser mke 400 test | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read
A Broadcasters Guide to Microservices
Roger Persson

The word “microservices” has been creeping into the conversation about software-centric systems recently. Is it really a different approach, what does it mean, and what are the advantages?

Tags: nxt edition | microservices | modular software | Roger Persson
Contributing Author Roger Persson Click to read
Streaming Technologies Explained
Bruce Devlin - new

The word streaming can relate to different technologies from different manufacturers in different scenarios and in this short article we are going to take a little tour of what it all means. 

Tags: mr mxf | streaming | hls | dash | cmaf | mpeg | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new Click to read
REVIEW - Hollyland MARS 400S PRO Digital Wireless Transmission System
Phil Vinter

Built by Hollyland and costing around £600 the Mars 400S is an easy-to-use wireless video transmitter/receiver system – it will be right up the alley of anyone who, like me, considers an instruction manual to be nothing more than box padding.

Read Phils Full review here, and link to the video review.

Tags: HOLLYLAND | MARS 400 | wireless | tx | rx | Phil Vinter
Contributing Author Phil Vinter Click to read